The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative Study

Seal lice (Anoplura) parasitize amphibious hosts, such as pinnipeds, and are uniquely adapted to an oceanic environment. As obligate, permanent ectoparasites feed on the blood of their hosts and are completely dependent on them. While studies have begun to explore general diving adaptations, researc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paula Olivera, Claudio R. Lazzari, María Soledad Leonardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/6/574
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839653733568348160
author Paula Olivera
Claudio R. Lazzari
María Soledad Leonardi
author_facet Paula Olivera
Claudio R. Lazzari
María Soledad Leonardi
author_sort Paula Olivera
collection DOAJ
description Seal lice (Anoplura) parasitize amphibious hosts, such as pinnipeds, and are uniquely adapted to an oceanic environment. As obligate, permanent ectoparasites feed on the blood of their hosts and are completely dependent on them. While studies have begun to explore general diving adaptations, research into seal lice’s sensory biology remains limited. In contrast to the vast majority of insects, including human lice, seal lice are devoid of eyes and depend on antennal sensory reception. This study aims to describe the morphology and putative function of antennal sensilla in five seal lice species: <i>Antarctophthirus microchir</i>, <i>A. carlinii</i>, <i>A. lobodontis</i>, <i>A. ogmorhini</i>, and <i>Lepidophthirus macrorhini</i>, which parasitize the South American sea lion, Weddell seal, crabeater seal, leopard seal, and southern elephant seal, respectively. The antennal structures of each species were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy, and eight morphotypes were identified: spine, cuticular lobe, sensilla squamiformia, sensilla chaetica, sensilla basiconica I and II, tuft organs, and pore organs. The morphology of sensilla and their distribution on the antennal flagellum exhibited variability among genera and species. For instance, the southern elephant louse (<i>Lepidophthirus macrorhini</i>) is characterized by the presence of sensilla squamiformia, while <i>Antarctophthirus</i> spp. are distinguished by sensilla chaetica.
format Article
id doaj-art-b55fc89a63da4deda2d4d795dcf7a99a
institution Matheson Library
issn 2075-4450
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Insects
spelling doaj-art-b55fc89a63da4deda2d4d795dcf7a99a2025-06-25T13:58:14ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502025-05-0116657410.3390/insects16060574The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative StudyPaula Olivera0Claudio R. Lazzari1María Soledad Leonardi2Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos, IBIOMAR-CONICET, Puerto Madryn U9120ACD, Chubut, ArgentinaInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), UMR7261 CNRS-University of Tours, 37200 Tours, FranceInstituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos, IBIOMAR-CONICET, Puerto Madryn U9120ACD, Chubut, ArgentinaSeal lice (Anoplura) parasitize amphibious hosts, such as pinnipeds, and are uniquely adapted to an oceanic environment. As obligate, permanent ectoparasites feed on the blood of their hosts and are completely dependent on them. While studies have begun to explore general diving adaptations, research into seal lice’s sensory biology remains limited. In contrast to the vast majority of insects, including human lice, seal lice are devoid of eyes and depend on antennal sensory reception. This study aims to describe the morphology and putative function of antennal sensilla in five seal lice species: <i>Antarctophthirus microchir</i>, <i>A. carlinii</i>, <i>A. lobodontis</i>, <i>A. ogmorhini</i>, and <i>Lepidophthirus macrorhini</i>, which parasitize the South American sea lion, Weddell seal, crabeater seal, leopard seal, and southern elephant seal, respectively. The antennal structures of each species were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy, and eight morphotypes were identified: spine, cuticular lobe, sensilla squamiformia, sensilla chaetica, sensilla basiconica I and II, tuft organs, and pore organs. The morphology of sensilla and their distribution on the antennal flagellum exhibited variability among genera and species. For instance, the southern elephant louse (<i>Lepidophthirus macrorhini</i>) is characterized by the presence of sensilla squamiformia, while <i>Antarctophthirus</i> spp. are distinguished by sensilla chaetica.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/6/574antennaeEchinophthiriidaeseal licesensilla
spellingShingle Paula Olivera
Claudio R. Lazzari
María Soledad Leonardi
The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative Study
Insects
antennae
Echinophthiriidae
seal lice
sensilla
title The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative Study
title_full The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative Study
title_fullStr The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative Study
title_short The Sensory Equipment of Diving Lice, a Host Ecology-Based Comparative Study
title_sort sensory equipment of diving lice a host ecology based comparative study
topic antennae
Echinophthiriidae
seal lice
sensilla
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/6/574
work_keys_str_mv AT paulaolivera thesensoryequipmentofdivingliceahostecologybasedcomparativestudy
AT claudiorlazzari thesensoryequipmentofdivingliceahostecologybasedcomparativestudy
AT mariasoledadleonardi thesensoryequipmentofdivingliceahostecologybasedcomparativestudy
AT paulaolivera sensoryequipmentofdivingliceahostecologybasedcomparativestudy
AT claudiorlazzari sensoryequipmentofdivingliceahostecologybasedcomparativestudy
AT mariasoledadleonardi sensoryequipmentofdivingliceahostecologybasedcomparativestudy