Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level Data

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Leadless pacemakers provide an innovative alternative to traditional transvenous pacemakers for managing cardiac arrhythmias. The objective of this systematic review is to conduct a meta-analysis comparing acute complication and mortality rates associate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akmoldir Sarsenbayeva, Adil Baimbetov, Aras Puodziukynas, Bolatbek Baimakhanov, Alexander Sapunov, Kenzhebek Bizhanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/6/974
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839653393963941888
author Akmoldir Sarsenbayeva
Adil Baimbetov
Aras Puodziukynas
Bolatbek Baimakhanov
Alexander Sapunov
Kenzhebek Bizhanov
author_facet Akmoldir Sarsenbayeva
Adil Baimbetov
Aras Puodziukynas
Bolatbek Baimakhanov
Alexander Sapunov
Kenzhebek Bizhanov
author_sort Akmoldir Sarsenbayeva
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and Objectives</i>: Leadless pacemakers provide an innovative alternative to traditional transvenous pacemakers for managing cardiac arrhythmias. The objective of this systematic review is to conduct a meta-analysis comparing acute complication and mortality rates associated with leadless pacemakers versus transvenous pacemaker placements using national-level data. Specifically, we aim to summarize the current evidence and calculate pooled odds ratios for acute overall complications, acute device-related complications, and acute mortality to assess the early safety outcomes of leadless pacemaker placement relative to traditional transvenous pacemakers. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was conducted by two independent researchers using a predefined search protocol. The search included articles published up to 10 October 2024, without limits on review depth. Studies were included if they provided national-level data comparing leadless pacemaker and traditional pacemaker recipients in terms of acute mortality, acute overall complications, and acute device-related complications. Outcomes were pooled to calculate odds ratios using a random-effects model in RStudio (version 2024.12.1+563). <i>Results</i>: A total of five studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled odds ratio for acute mortality was 2.03 (95% CI: 0.65–6.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; <i>p</i> < 0.01), for acute overall complications was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.45–2.61, I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; <i>p</i> < 0.01), and for acute device-related complications was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.23–4.44, I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <i>Conclusions</i>: The reviewed studies suggest that leadless pacemakers offer a promising alternative to transvenous pacemakers, offering a comparable short-term safety profile. Ongoing technological advancements may further enhance their applicability in clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-a8029b7a6a3c49e590b7902af86c0e7f
institution Matheson Library
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj-art-a8029b7a6a3c49e590b7902af86c0e7f2025-06-25T14:09:26ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442025-05-0161697410.3390/medicina61060974Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level DataAkmoldir Sarsenbayeva0Adil Baimbetov1Aras Puodziukynas2Bolatbek Baimakhanov3Alexander Sapunov4Kenzhebek Bizhanov5Department of Interventional Cardiology, Arrhythmology and Endovascular Surgery, Syzganov National Scientific Center of Surgery, Almaty 050004, KazakhstanDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Arrhythmology and Endovascular Surgery, Syzganov National Scientific Center of Surgery, Almaty 050004, KazakhstanHospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences “Kauno klinikos”, LT-50161 Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of General Surgery, Syzganov National Scientific Center of Surgery, Almaty 050004, KazakhstanDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Arrhythmology and Endovascular Surgery, Syzganov National Scientific Center of Surgery, Almaty 050004, KazakhstanDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Arrhythmology and Endovascular Surgery, Syzganov National Scientific Center of Surgery, Almaty 050004, Kazakhstan<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Leadless pacemakers provide an innovative alternative to traditional transvenous pacemakers for managing cardiac arrhythmias. The objective of this systematic review is to conduct a meta-analysis comparing acute complication and mortality rates associated with leadless pacemakers versus transvenous pacemaker placements using national-level data. Specifically, we aim to summarize the current evidence and calculate pooled odds ratios for acute overall complications, acute device-related complications, and acute mortality to assess the early safety outcomes of leadless pacemaker placement relative to traditional transvenous pacemakers. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was conducted by two independent researchers using a predefined search protocol. The search included articles published up to 10 October 2024, without limits on review depth. Studies were included if they provided national-level data comparing leadless pacemaker and traditional pacemaker recipients in terms of acute mortality, acute overall complications, and acute device-related complications. Outcomes were pooled to calculate odds ratios using a random-effects model in RStudio (version 2024.12.1+563). <i>Results</i>: A total of five studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled odds ratio for acute mortality was 2.03 (95% CI: 0.65–6.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; <i>p</i> < 0.01), for acute overall complications was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.45–2.61, I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; <i>p</i> < 0.01), and for acute device-related complications was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.23–4.44, I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <i>Conclusions</i>: The reviewed studies suggest that leadless pacemakers offer a promising alternative to transvenous pacemakers, offering a comparable short-term safety profile. Ongoing technological advancements may further enhance their applicability in clinical practice.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/6/974leadless pacemakersbradyarrhythmiaheart failureatrial fibrillationcardiac pacingtransvenous pacemakers
spellingShingle Akmoldir Sarsenbayeva
Adil Baimbetov
Aras Puodziukynas
Bolatbek Baimakhanov
Alexander Sapunov
Kenzhebek Bizhanov
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level Data
Medicina
leadless pacemakers
bradyarrhythmia
heart failure
atrial fibrillation
cardiac pacing
transvenous pacemakers
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level Data
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level Data
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level Data
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level Data
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Mortality and Complication Rates Following Leadless Pacemaker Placement Using National-Level Data
title_sort systematic review and meta analysis of acute mortality and complication rates following leadless pacemaker placement using national level data
topic leadless pacemakers
bradyarrhythmia
heart failure
atrial fibrillation
cardiac pacing
transvenous pacemakers
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/6/974
work_keys_str_mv AT akmoldirsarsenbayeva systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofacutemortalityandcomplicationratesfollowingleadlesspacemakerplacementusingnationalleveldata
AT adilbaimbetov systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofacutemortalityandcomplicationratesfollowingleadlesspacemakerplacementusingnationalleveldata
AT araspuodziukynas systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofacutemortalityandcomplicationratesfollowingleadlesspacemakerplacementusingnationalleveldata
AT bolatbekbaimakhanov systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofacutemortalityandcomplicationratesfollowingleadlesspacemakerplacementusingnationalleveldata
AT alexandersapunov systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofacutemortalityandcomplicationratesfollowingleadlesspacemakerplacementusingnationalleveldata
AT kenzhebekbizhanov systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofacutemortalityandcomplicationratesfollowingleadlesspacemakerplacementusingnationalleveldata