EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse Riding
This study evaluated the suitability of the vibration dose value (VDV) and action and limit values from the EU Directive 2002/44/EC in assessing lower back health risks due to repeated shocks using common horse riding as an example. The difference between pelvis- and saddle-based VDV calculations wa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Vibration |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2571-631X/8/2/26 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839652415613173760 |
|---|---|
| author | Nerissa A. Smit Jelte E. Bos Jaap H. van Dieën Idsart Kingma |
| author_facet | Nerissa A. Smit Jelte E. Bos Jaap H. van Dieën Idsart Kingma |
| author_sort | Nerissa A. Smit |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study evaluated the suitability of the vibration dose value (VDV) and action and limit values from the EU Directive 2002/44/EC in assessing lower back health risks due to repeated shocks using common horse riding as an example. The difference between pelvis- and saddle-based VDV calculations was assessed. VDVs were calculated from accelerations measured using inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the saddle and the rider’s pelvis during walking (30 min) and cantering (10 min). Saddle and pelvis VDVs were similar, 12–31 m/s<sup>1.75</sup> for walking and 46–69 m/s<sup>1.75</sup> for cantering. Accelerations reached the action value (9.1 m/s<sup>1.75</sup>) within 03:16 min of walking and 00:08 min of cantering. Accelerations reached the limit value (21 m/s<sup>1.75</sup>) within 30:00 min or 00:26 min of cantering. Although VDV reached limits quickly, walking and cantering are generally harmless for the lower back. Application of the VDV and associated limits for repeated shocks assessment might need reconsideration. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a6af4dac9c044e99a96b0d5bc8ae6b32 |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2571-631X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vibration |
| spelling | doaj-art-a6af4dac9c044e99a96b0d5bc8ae6b322025-06-25T14:30:43ZengMDPI AGVibration2571-631X2025-05-01822610.3390/vibration8020026EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse RidingNerissa A. Smit0Jelte E. Bos1Jaap H. van Dieën2Idsart Kingma3Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The NetherlandsThis study evaluated the suitability of the vibration dose value (VDV) and action and limit values from the EU Directive 2002/44/EC in assessing lower back health risks due to repeated shocks using common horse riding as an example. The difference between pelvis- and saddle-based VDV calculations was assessed. VDVs were calculated from accelerations measured using inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the saddle and the rider’s pelvis during walking (30 min) and cantering (10 min). Saddle and pelvis VDVs were similar, 12–31 m/s<sup>1.75</sup> for walking and 46–69 m/s<sup>1.75</sup> for cantering. Accelerations reached the action value (9.1 m/s<sup>1.75</sup>) within 03:16 min of walking and 00:08 min of cantering. Accelerations reached the limit value (21 m/s<sup>1.75</sup>) within 30:00 min or 00:26 min of cantering. Although VDV reached limits quickly, walking and cantering are generally harmless for the lower back. Application of the VDV and associated limits for repeated shocks assessment might need reconsideration.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-631X/8/2/26biomechanicsback injuryvibrationimpact loading |
| spellingShingle | Nerissa A. Smit Jelte E. Bos Jaap H. van Dieën Idsart Kingma EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse Riding Vibration biomechanics back injury vibration impact loading |
| title | EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse Riding |
| title_full | EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse Riding |
| title_fullStr | EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse Riding |
| title_full_unstemmed | EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse Riding |
| title_short | EU Vibration Limit Values May Be Too Strict for Evaluating the Effect of Impact Loading on the Lower Back During Horse Riding |
| title_sort | eu vibration limit values may be too strict for evaluating the effect of impact loading on the lower back during horse riding |
| topic | biomechanics back injury vibration impact loading |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2571-631X/8/2/26 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nerissaasmit euvibrationlimitvaluesmaybetoostrictforevaluatingtheeffectofimpactloadingonthelowerbackduringhorseriding AT jelteebos euvibrationlimitvaluesmaybetoostrictforevaluatingtheeffectofimpactloadingonthelowerbackduringhorseriding AT jaaphvandieen euvibrationlimitvaluesmaybetoostrictforevaluatingtheeffectofimpactloadingonthelowerbackduringhorseriding AT idsartkingma euvibrationlimitvaluesmaybetoostrictforevaluatingtheeffectofimpactloadingonthelowerbackduringhorseriding |