Psychometric Properties of the Self-as-Context Scale with a University Counseling Center Sample

The model upon which acceptance and commitment therapy is based posits that its outcomes are mediated by increased psychological flexibility as a core process. Of the six subprocesses contributing to psychological flexibility, self-as-context has been investigated the least due to a lack of adequate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert D. Zettle, Grace A. Lyons, Jonathan M. Larson, Christopher Leonard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Behavioral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/7/910
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The model upon which acceptance and commitment therapy is based posits that its outcomes are mediated by increased psychological flexibility as a core process. Of the six subprocesses contributing to psychological flexibility, self-as-context has been investigated the least due to a lack of adequate assessment. An evaluation of the psychometric properties of at least one such measure—the Self-as-Context Scale (SACS)—has been primarily limited to nonclinical populations. To address this omission, we administered the SACS to students (<i>N</i> = 132) seeking psychological services from their university counseling center. A confirmatory factor analysis failed to find an adequate fit for a previously reported two-dimensional model of the SACS, suggesting that only total scores may be appropriate in research and practice involving clinical samples. All 10 items satisfactorily loaded on a single factor to produce reliable total scaled scores, which were, as expected, significantly lower for our participants than those from a general college student sample. Even lower scores were obtained for outpatients of a psychology training clinic compared to our sample, which provided additional support for the known-groups validity of the SACS. The limitations of the findings and implications for further investigations of the measure’s psychometric and functional properties are discussed.
ISSN:2076-328X