Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review
Objectives: Moderately-rough implant surface may improve implant therapy in terms of bone integration, but the increased surface roughness might affect the initiation and development of peri-implantitis. The aim of the present review was to compare the prevalence of peri-implantitis in implants with...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology
2019-03-01
|
| Series: | eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2019/1/e1/v10n1e1ht.htm |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839598900706541568 |
|---|---|
| author | Nikola Saulacic Benoit Schaller |
| author_facet | Nikola Saulacic Benoit Schaller |
| author_sort | Nikola Saulacic |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives: Moderately-rough implant surface may improve implant therapy in terms of bone integration, but the increased surface roughness might affect the initiation and development of peri-implantitis. The aim of the present review was to compare the prevalence of peri-implantitis in implants with rough and turned (machined) implant surfaces.
Material and Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles published between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2018. Clinical human studies in the English language that had reported on prevalence of peri-implantitis in tuned and rough surface implants searched. The initial search resulted in 690 articles.
Results: Eight articles with 2992 implants were included in the systematic review. The incidence of peri-implantitis for two implant surfaces varied between studies. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to the heterogeneity among studies. Implant with rough surfaces were more favourable for plaque accumulation during short-term follow-up. On a long-term, turned implants surfaces were associated with more plaque and higher peri-implant bone loss. Peri-implant clinical parameters and survival rate for two implant surfaces was similar.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, rough implant surface does not seem to increase the incidence of peri-implantitis in comparison to turned implants surface. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a3731c8b3e8e4c1a86dc8436e33fa17f |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2029-283X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-03-01 |
| publisher | Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-a3731c8b3e8e4c1a86dc8436e33fa17f2025-08-02T15:40:55ZengLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of OdontologyeJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2019-03-01101e110.5037/jomr.2019.10101Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic ReviewNikola SaulacicBenoit SchallerObjectives: Moderately-rough implant surface may improve implant therapy in terms of bone integration, but the increased surface roughness might affect the initiation and development of peri-implantitis. The aim of the present review was to compare the prevalence of peri-implantitis in implants with rough and turned (machined) implant surfaces. Material and Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles published between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2018. Clinical human studies in the English language that had reported on prevalence of peri-implantitis in tuned and rough surface implants searched. The initial search resulted in 690 articles. Results: Eight articles with 2992 implants were included in the systematic review. The incidence of peri-implantitis for two implant surfaces varied between studies. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to the heterogeneity among studies. Implant with rough surfaces were more favourable for plaque accumulation during short-term follow-up. On a long-term, turned implants surfaces were associated with more plaque and higher peri-implant bone loss. Peri-implant clinical parameters and survival rate for two implant surfaces was similar. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, rough implant surface does not seem to increase the incidence of peri-implantitis in comparison to turned implants surface.https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2019/1/e1/v10n1e1ht.htmdental implantosseointegrated dental implantationperi-implantitissystematic reviewtitanium |
| spellingShingle | Nikola Saulacic Benoit Schaller Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research dental implant osseointegrated dental implantation peri-implantitis systematic review titanium |
| title | Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review |
| title_full | Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review |
| title_short | Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review |
| title_sort | prevalence of peri implantitis in implants with turned and rough surfaces a systematic review |
| topic | dental implant osseointegrated dental implantation peri-implantitis systematic review titanium |
| url | https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2019/1/e1/v10n1e1ht.htm |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nikolasaulacic prevalenceofperiimplantitisinimplantswithturnedandroughsurfacesasystematicreview AT benoitschaller prevalenceofperiimplantitisinimplantswithturnedandroughsurfacesasystematicreview |