Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic review

One of the key elements of medical care is the assessment of the patient’s condition, which allows making a diagnosis and evaluating the patient’s health status, the severity of the disease  and the prognosis of its outcome. To date, medical professionals use various methods of assessing the patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. M. Vatolin, O. A. Sukhorukikh, Zh. A. Galeeva, D. V. Lukyantseva, O. O. Buzuverova, O. V. Kirsanova, E. M. Murtazina, D. G. Ilyukhin, L. S. Shubina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: IRBIS LLC 2018-05-01
Series:Фармакоэкономика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/231
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839584426896392192
author V. M. Vatolin
O. A. Sukhorukikh
Zh. A. Galeeva
D. V. Lukyantseva
O. O. Buzuverova
O. V. Kirsanova
E. M. Murtazina
D. G. Ilyukhin
L. S. Shubina
author_facet V. M. Vatolin
O. A. Sukhorukikh
Zh. A. Galeeva
D. V. Lukyantseva
O. O. Buzuverova
O. V. Kirsanova
E. M. Murtazina
D. G. Ilyukhin
L. S. Shubina
author_sort V. M. Vatolin
collection DOAJ
description One of the key elements of medical care is the assessment of the patient’s condition, which allows making a diagnosis and evaluating the patient’s health status, the severity of the disease  and the prognosis of its outcome. To date, medical professionals use various methods of assessing the patient’s condition; these methods are listed in “Clinical Recommendations”  posted in the information resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia.Objective: to analyze and systemize the many methods of clinical evaluation, e. g. scores, indices, questionnaires and other approaches that appear in the clinical guidelines.Methods. We analyzed the clinical guidelines developed by professional non-profit medical  organizations and posted on the information resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation under the “Clinical Recommendations” category. A list of clinical assessment methods  derived from these guidelines was composed and potential problems in their implementation by medical organizations were identified.Results. The unified list of clinical assessments presented in the guidelines includes 175 clinical  assessment methods. The most common methods of clinical evaluation were the VAS pain score  (in 23 clinical guidelines), the Glasgow coma scale (in 11 clinical guidelines), and the ECOG scale  (in 10 clinical guidelines).Conclusion. The methods of clinical evaluation, indicated in the Minzdrav information resource  are narrowly specialized; they are used and interpreted by a physician. Some important  information about these methods and their validation is missing, which necessitates further  efforts by the medical community to improve and update these methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-a18a4dfab5fa4fe6a2eb7e9cbb83a4f5
institution Matheson Library
issn 2070-4909
2070-4933
language Russian
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher IRBIS LLC
record_format Article
series Фармакоэкономика
spelling doaj-art-a18a4dfab5fa4fe6a2eb7e9cbb83a4f52025-08-03T19:49:34ZrusIRBIS LLCФармакоэкономика2070-49092070-49332018-05-01111566310.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.1.056-063211Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic reviewV. M. Vatolin0O. A. Sukhorukikh1Zh. A. Galeeva2D. V. Lukyantseva3O. O. Buzuverova4O. V. Kirsanova5E. M. Murtazina6D. G. Ilyukhin7L. S. Shubina8Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget InstitutionCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget InstitutionCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationOne of the key elements of medical care is the assessment of the patient’s condition, which allows making a diagnosis and evaluating the patient’s health status, the severity of the disease  and the prognosis of its outcome. To date, medical professionals use various methods of assessing the patient’s condition; these methods are listed in “Clinical Recommendations”  posted in the information resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia.Objective: to analyze and systemize the many methods of clinical evaluation, e. g. scores, indices, questionnaires and other approaches that appear in the clinical guidelines.Methods. We analyzed the clinical guidelines developed by professional non-profit medical  organizations and posted on the information resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation under the “Clinical Recommendations” category. A list of clinical assessment methods  derived from these guidelines was composed and potential problems in their implementation by medical organizations were identified.Results. The unified list of clinical assessments presented in the guidelines includes 175 clinical  assessment methods. The most common methods of clinical evaluation were the VAS pain score  (in 23 clinical guidelines), the Glasgow coma scale (in 11 clinical guidelines), and the ECOG scale  (in 10 clinical guidelines).Conclusion. The methods of clinical evaluation, indicated in the Minzdrav information resource  are narrowly specialized; they are used and interpreted by a physician. Some important  information about these methods and their validation is missing, which necessitates further  efforts by the medical community to improve and update these methods.https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/231clinical guidelinesassessing patient’s conditionclinical scalesclinical indicesclinical questionnaires
spellingShingle V. M. Vatolin
O. A. Sukhorukikh
Zh. A. Galeeva
D. V. Lukyantseva
O. O. Buzuverova
O. V. Kirsanova
E. M. Murtazina
D. G. Ilyukhin
L. S. Shubina
Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic review
Фармакоэкономика
clinical guidelines
assessing patient’s condition
clinical scales
clinical indices
clinical questionnaires
title Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic review
title_full Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic review
title_fullStr Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic review
title_short Methods of clinical assessment from the “Clinical Recommendations” resource of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia: a systematic review
title_sort methods of clinical assessment from the clinical recommendations resource of the ministry of healthcare of russia a systematic review
topic clinical guidelines
assessing patient’s condition
clinical scales
clinical indices
clinical questionnaires
url https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/231
work_keys_str_mv AT vmvatolin methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT oasukhorukikh methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT zhagaleeva methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT dvlukyantseva methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT oobuzuverova methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT ovkirsanova methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT emmurtazina methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT dgilyukhin methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview
AT lsshubina methodsofclinicalassessmentfromtheclinicalrecommendationsresourceoftheministryofhealthcareofrussiaasystematicreview