China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agencies

Can procuratorial agencies play a key role in China’s governance of marine plastic pollution (MPPG)? Within the current discussions about the legal framework of China’s MPPG, courts, marine environmental regulatory authorities, procuratorial agencies, and environmental protection organizations are t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben-Chao Fu, Chuan-Kai Guo, Xiu-Juan Li, Hai-Dong Cai, Jin-Hua Guo, He-Ran Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1633230/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839627739074658304
author Ben-Chao Fu
Chuan-Kai Guo
Xiu-Juan Li
Hai-Dong Cai
Jin-Hua Guo
He-Ran Li
author_facet Ben-Chao Fu
Chuan-Kai Guo
Xiu-Juan Li
Hai-Dong Cai
Jin-Hua Guo
He-Ran Li
author_sort Ben-Chao Fu
collection DOAJ
description Can procuratorial agencies play a key role in China’s governance of marine plastic pollution (MPPG)? Within the current discussions about the legal framework of China’s MPPG, courts, marine environmental regulatory authorities, procuratorial agencies, and environmental protection organizations are typically seen as the main stakeholders. However, the role of procuratorial agencies, as the statutory entity for initiating PIL in marine environmental protection, has been significantly overlooked. This raises a range of questions including how should procuratorial agencies leverage their advantages in PIL to enhance the diversity of participants in the litigation process? What inherent challenges exist in marine environmental lawsuits? What substantive and procedural obstacles will procuratorial agencies face when engaging in MPPG-related litigation? This study argues that procuratorial agencies, by fulfilling their public interest litigation (PIL) function in marine environmental protection, can effectively improve MPPG governance. The study focuses on issues such as the unclear prerequisites for initiating MPPG-related lawsuits by procuratorial agencies, the criteria for selecting diverse litigation models, and the applicability of procuratorial agencies’ PIL in foreign-related cases.
format Article
id doaj-art-a09766a571634a48b9e270ea9bcb0b22
institution Matheson Library
issn 2296-7745
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj-art-a09766a571634a48b9e270ea9bcb0b222025-07-16T05:34:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452025-07-011210.3389/fmars.2025.16332301633230China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agenciesBen-Chao Fu0Chuan-Kai Guo1Xiu-Juan Li2Hai-Dong Cai3Jin-Hua Guo4He-Ran Li5School of Law, Shandong University, Qingdao, ChinaSchool of Law, Shandong University, Qingdao, ChinaPeople’s Procuratorate of Shandong Province, Jinan, ChinaKing & Wood Mallesons, Jinan, ChinaSchool of Law, Shandong University, Qingdao, ChinaSchool of Law, Shandong University, Qingdao, ChinaCan procuratorial agencies play a key role in China’s governance of marine plastic pollution (MPPG)? Within the current discussions about the legal framework of China’s MPPG, courts, marine environmental regulatory authorities, procuratorial agencies, and environmental protection organizations are typically seen as the main stakeholders. However, the role of procuratorial agencies, as the statutory entity for initiating PIL in marine environmental protection, has been significantly overlooked. This raises a range of questions including how should procuratorial agencies leverage their advantages in PIL to enhance the diversity of participants in the litigation process? What inherent challenges exist in marine environmental lawsuits? What substantive and procedural obstacles will procuratorial agencies face when engaging in MPPG-related litigation? This study argues that procuratorial agencies, by fulfilling their public interest litigation (PIL) function in marine environmental protection, can effectively improve MPPG governance. The study focuses on issues such as the unclear prerequisites for initiating MPPG-related lawsuits by procuratorial agencies, the criteria for selecting diverse litigation models, and the applicability of procuratorial agencies’ PIL in foreign-related cases.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1633230/fullmarine plastic pollutionmarine environmental supervision authoritiesPILmarine environmental public interest litigationprocuratorial proposals
spellingShingle Ben-Chao Fu
Chuan-Kai Guo
Xiu-Juan Li
Hai-Dong Cai
Jin-Hua Guo
He-Ran Li
China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agencies
Frontiers in Marine Science
marine plastic pollution
marine environmental supervision authorities
PIL
marine environmental public interest litigation
procuratorial proposals
title China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agencies
title_full China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agencies
title_fullStr China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agencies
title_full_unstemmed China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agencies
title_short China’s marine plastic pollution governance path: focusing on the judicial positioning of PIL initiated by procuratorial agencies
title_sort china s marine plastic pollution governance path focusing on the judicial positioning of pil initiated by procuratorial agencies
topic marine plastic pollution
marine environmental supervision authorities
PIL
marine environmental public interest litigation
procuratorial proposals
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1633230/full
work_keys_str_mv AT benchaofu chinasmarineplasticpollutiongovernancepathfocusingonthejudicialpositioningofpilinitiatedbyprocuratorialagencies
AT chuankaiguo chinasmarineplasticpollutiongovernancepathfocusingonthejudicialpositioningofpilinitiatedbyprocuratorialagencies
AT xiujuanli chinasmarineplasticpollutiongovernancepathfocusingonthejudicialpositioningofpilinitiatedbyprocuratorialagencies
AT haidongcai chinasmarineplasticpollutiongovernancepathfocusingonthejudicialpositioningofpilinitiatedbyprocuratorialagencies
AT jinhuaguo chinasmarineplasticpollutiongovernancepathfocusingonthejudicialpositioningofpilinitiatedbyprocuratorialagencies
AT heranli chinasmarineplasticpollutiongovernancepathfocusingonthejudicialpositioningofpilinitiatedbyprocuratorialagencies