COMMON MISTAKES MADE BY FORENSIC EXAMINERS WHEN CONDUCTING HUMAN TRACE EVIDENCE EXAMINATIONS AND DOCUMENTING THEIR RESULTS
The paper reviews the most common terminology and documentation mistakes in forensic expert reports on the outcomes of examinations classified under specialization 6.1 «Forensic examination of trace evidence of human and animal origin», and offers recommendations for elimination of such errors.
Saved in:
Main Author: | E. Burova |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/77 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Analogs of Ridge Skin and Papillary Patterns in the Nature and the Significance of Their Study for Forensic Science and Forensic Examination
by: Sh. N. Khaziev
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Bias in Forensic Examination
by: A. V. Kokin
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Typical Mistakes in Forensic Examinations on Disputes Related to Child-Rearing
by: E. V. Vaske, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION IN FORENSIC HANDWRITING EXAMINATION
by: E. N. Belova
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Identification of commercial cultivars of Agaricus bisporus in China using genome-wide microsatellite markers
by: Li-ning WANG, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)