Scientific Justification and Policy Recommendations to the US Food and Drug Administration for Waiving Comparative Efficacy Studies
This detailed review looks at how the rules for proving biosimilarity are changing, mainly focusing on the requirements for comparative efficacy studies (CESs). As analytical technologies progress, mounting evidence suggests that when we establish robust analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equ...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Sarfaraz K. Niazi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
Series: | Pharmaceuticals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/18/6/779 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGNING OF CLINICAL TRIALS
by: O. S. Kobyakova, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
N-nitrosamine risk assessment in pharmaceuticals: Where are we from a regulatory point of view in 2025?
by: Yue Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-12-01) -
Use of real-world data for decision making in Canada and United Kingdom
by: P. A. Mukhortova, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Efficacy and safety of adalimumab biosimilar GP2017 in a 24-month treatment period for plaque psoriasis: real-life experience from Emilia-Romagna centers, Italy
by: Marco May Lee, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Analysis of RWD/RWE recommendations and guidelines for 2021. International experience on the example of USA
by: A. Kurylev
Published: (2022-11-01)