Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature
A memoir-type narrative as a structured text in a certain way, represented by at least two types of oral story: (1) a repeatedly reproduced narrative (a story about the war) and (2) an unprepared segment of a speech (a story about life in Irkutsk during the existence of the USSR and after its collap...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Научный диалог |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3848 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1839585172658323456 |
---|---|
author | E. E. Burova A. A. Racheva U. E. Chekmez |
author_facet | E. E. Burova A. A. Racheva U. E. Chekmez |
author_sort | E. E. Burova |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A memoir-type narrative as a structured text in a certain way, represented by at least two types of oral story: (1) a repeatedly reproduced narrative (a story about the war) and (2) an unprepared segment of a speech (a story about life in Irkutsk during the existence of the USSR and after its collapse) is considered in the article. The first variety in the scientific literature was called the “record” story. In the course of comparing the two fragments related to the mentioned types of narration, the phonetic, lexical and grammatical means used by the subject of speech and reflecting the specifics of the story-“record” on the theme of war are characterized. Thanks to an integrated approach to the linguistic features of the narrative, detailed conclusions are drawn regarding its organization. It has been established that at different linguistic levels the story-“record” has certain distinctive features, the most important of which are the use of functionally loaded prosodic means and the almost complete absence of speech failures, the use of a large number of bookish lexical elements, as well as grammatical structures characteristic of the official business language, written speeches. It is proved that all the identified features allow the speaker to give the features of a collectively significant memory to personal impressions of the war. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9f48a63e67d94e2782190b5a5e17a3ea |
institution | Matheson Library |
issn | 2225-756X 2227-1295 |
language | Russian |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov |
record_format | Article |
series | Научный диалог |
spelling | doaj-art-9f48a63e67d94e2782190b5a5e17a3ea2025-08-03T19:36:35ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952022-06-01115486810.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-5-48-682212Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic FeatureE. E. Burova0A. A. Racheva1U. E. Chekmez2Irkutsk State UniversityIrkutsk State UniversityIrkutsk State UniversityA memoir-type narrative as a structured text in a certain way, represented by at least two types of oral story: (1) a repeatedly reproduced narrative (a story about the war) and (2) an unprepared segment of a speech (a story about life in Irkutsk during the existence of the USSR and after its collapse) is considered in the article. The first variety in the scientific literature was called the “record” story. In the course of comparing the two fragments related to the mentioned types of narration, the phonetic, lexical and grammatical means used by the subject of speech and reflecting the specifics of the story-“record” on the theme of war are characterized. Thanks to an integrated approach to the linguistic features of the narrative, detailed conclusions are drawn regarding its organization. It has been established that at different linguistic levels the story-“record” has certain distinctive features, the most important of which are the use of functionally loaded prosodic means and the almost complete absence of speech failures, the use of a large number of bookish lexical elements, as well as grammatical structures characteristic of the official business language, written speeches. It is proved that all the identified features allow the speaker to give the features of a collectively significant memory to personal impressions of the war.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3848oral narrativestory-recordspontaneous narrativecollective memoryoral discourseprosody |
spellingShingle | E. E. Burova A. A. Racheva U. E. Chekmez Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature Научный диалог oral narrative story-record spontaneous narrative collective memory oral discourse prosody |
title | Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature |
title_full | Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature |
title_fullStr | Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature |
title_full_unstemmed | Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature |
title_short | Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature |
title_sort | story record vs spontaneous narrative in light of a comparative analysis of linguistic feature |
topic | oral narrative story-record spontaneous narrative collective memory oral discourse prosody |
url | https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3848 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eeburova storyrecordvsspontaneousnarrativeinlightofacomparativeanalysisoflinguisticfeature AT aaracheva storyrecordvsspontaneousnarrativeinlightofacomparativeanalysisoflinguisticfeature AT uechekmez storyrecordvsspontaneousnarrativeinlightofacomparativeanalysisoflinguisticfeature |