Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature

A memoir-type narrative as a structured text in a certain way, represented by at least two types of oral story: (1) a repeatedly reproduced narrative (a story about the war) and (2) an unprepared segment of a speech (a story about life in Irkutsk during the existence of the USSR and after its collap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. E. Burova, A. A. Racheva, U. E. Chekmez
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2022-06-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3848
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839585172658323456
author E. E. Burova
A. A. Racheva
U. E. Chekmez
author_facet E. E. Burova
A. A. Racheva
U. E. Chekmez
author_sort E. E. Burova
collection DOAJ
description A memoir-type narrative as a structured text in a certain way, represented by at least two types of oral story: (1) a repeatedly reproduced narrative (a story about the war) and (2) an unprepared segment of a speech (a story about life in Irkutsk during the existence of the USSR and after its collapse) is considered in the article. The first variety in the scientific literature was called the “record” story. In the course of comparing the two fragments related to the mentioned types of narration, the phonetic, lexical and grammatical means used by the subject of speech and reflecting the specifics of the story-“record” on the theme of war are characterized. Thanks to an integrated approach to the linguistic features of the narrative, detailed conclusions are drawn regarding its organization. It has been established that at different linguistic levels the story-“record” has certain distinctive features, the most important of which are the use of functionally loaded prosodic means and the almost complete absence of speech failures, the use of a large number of bookish lexical elements, as well as grammatical structures characteristic of the official business language, written speeches. It is proved that all the identified features allow the speaker to give the features of a collectively significant memory to personal impressions of the war.
format Article
id doaj-art-9f48a63e67d94e2782190b5a5e17a3ea
institution Matheson Library
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj-art-9f48a63e67d94e2782190b5a5e17a3ea2025-08-03T19:36:35ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952022-06-01115486810.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-5-48-682212Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic FeatureE. E. Burova0A. A. Racheva1U. E. Chekmez2Irkutsk State UniversityIrkutsk State UniversityIrkutsk State UniversityA memoir-type narrative as a structured text in a certain way, represented by at least two types of oral story: (1) a repeatedly reproduced narrative (a story about the war) and (2) an unprepared segment of a speech (a story about life in Irkutsk during the existence of the USSR and after its collapse) is considered in the article. The first variety in the scientific literature was called the “record” story. In the course of comparing the two fragments related to the mentioned types of narration, the phonetic, lexical and grammatical means used by the subject of speech and reflecting the specifics of the story-“record” on the theme of war are characterized. Thanks to an integrated approach to the linguistic features of the narrative, detailed conclusions are drawn regarding its organization. It has been established that at different linguistic levels the story-“record” has certain distinctive features, the most important of which are the use of functionally loaded prosodic means and the almost complete absence of speech failures, the use of a large number of bookish lexical elements, as well as grammatical structures characteristic of the official business language, written speeches. It is proved that all the identified features allow the speaker to give the features of a collectively significant memory to personal impressions of the war.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3848oral narrativestory-recordspontaneous narrativecollective memoryoral discourseprosody
spellingShingle E. E. Burova
A. A. Racheva
U. E. Chekmez
Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature
Научный диалог
oral narrative
story-record
spontaneous narrative
collective memory
oral discourse
prosody
title Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature
title_full Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature
title_fullStr Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature
title_full_unstemmed Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature
title_short Story-“Record” vs Spontaneous Narrative in Light of a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Feature
title_sort story record vs spontaneous narrative in light of a comparative analysis of linguistic feature
topic oral narrative
story-record
spontaneous narrative
collective memory
oral discourse
prosody
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3848
work_keys_str_mv AT eeburova storyrecordvsspontaneousnarrativeinlightofacomparativeanalysisoflinguisticfeature
AT aaracheva storyrecordvsspontaneousnarrativeinlightofacomparativeanalysisoflinguisticfeature
AT uechekmez storyrecordvsspontaneousnarrativeinlightofacomparativeanalysisoflinguisticfeature