Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back Squat

The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and stability of both Perception of Velocity (PV) and Perception of Velocity Loss (PVL) over four weeks, without any feedback regarding velocity during training sessions. Fifteen subjects performed six training sessions: four sessions familiarize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emanuele Dello Stritto, Antonio Gramazio, Ruggero Romagnoli, Maria Francesca Piacentini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/13/7252
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839632440691261440
author Emanuele Dello Stritto
Antonio Gramazio
Ruggero Romagnoli
Maria Francesca Piacentini
author_facet Emanuele Dello Stritto
Antonio Gramazio
Ruggero Romagnoli
Maria Francesca Piacentini
author_sort Emanuele Dello Stritto
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and stability of both Perception of Velocity (PV) and Perception of Velocity Loss (PVL) over four weeks, without any feedback regarding velocity during training sessions. Fifteen subjects performed six training sessions: four sessions familiarized the athletes with PV and PVL and the final two sessions assessed the accuracy and stability of PV and PVL, with one conducted 48 h after the familiarization and the other after 4 weeks. To assess PV and PVL, two loads (60% 1RM and 80% 1RM) and two velocity losses (20% VL and 40% VL) were employed. PV accuracy was measured by the DeltaScore, the difference between perceived velocity (Vp) and the velocity provided by the encoder (Vr): DetlaScore = Vp − Vr. PVL was measured by the Vscore, the difference between repetitions where the subject perceived the target %VL (Np) and repetitions that actually met it (Nr): Vscore = Np − Nr. The analysis performed revealed no differences in DeltaScore nor in Vscore between the two test sessions performed 4 weeks apart (<i>p</i> > 0.05). On the other hand, the effect of load on both DeltaScore and Vscore was significant in both sessions (<i>p</i> < 0.05). PVL and PV accuracy are stable throughout time. PVL may be used to prescribe and monitor velocity-based training. Conversely, when prescribing training sessions based on PV, it is essential to pair PV with a perception scale and incorporate an encoder when possible.
format Article
id doaj-art-9ee5e30647fa4e9f81f3261d2676bb5f
institution Matheson Library
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-9ee5e30647fa4e9f81f3261d2676bb5f2025-07-11T14:36:10ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-06-011513725210.3390/app15137252Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back SquatEmanuele Dello Stritto0Antonio Gramazio1Ruggero Romagnoli2Maria Francesca Piacentini3Department of Human Movement and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Piazza L. De Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Piazza L. De Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Via Isimbardi, 10, 22060 Novedrate, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Piazza L. De Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, ItalyThe aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and stability of both Perception of Velocity (PV) and Perception of Velocity Loss (PVL) over four weeks, without any feedback regarding velocity during training sessions. Fifteen subjects performed six training sessions: four sessions familiarized the athletes with PV and PVL and the final two sessions assessed the accuracy and stability of PV and PVL, with one conducted 48 h after the familiarization and the other after 4 weeks. To assess PV and PVL, two loads (60% 1RM and 80% 1RM) and two velocity losses (20% VL and 40% VL) were employed. PV accuracy was measured by the DeltaScore, the difference between perceived velocity (Vp) and the velocity provided by the encoder (Vr): DetlaScore = Vp − Vr. PVL was measured by the Vscore, the difference between repetitions where the subject perceived the target %VL (Np) and repetitions that actually met it (Nr): Vscore = Np − Nr. The analysis performed revealed no differences in DeltaScore nor in Vscore between the two test sessions performed 4 weeks apart (<i>p</i> > 0.05). On the other hand, the effect of load on both DeltaScore and Vscore was significant in both sessions (<i>p</i> < 0.05). PVL and PV accuracy are stable throughout time. PVL may be used to prescribe and monitor velocity-based training. Conversely, when prescribing training sessions based on PV, it is essential to pair PV with a perception scale and incorporate an encoder when possible.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/13/7252velocity based trainingresistance trainingvelocity perceptionvelocity-loss perception
spellingShingle Emanuele Dello Stritto
Antonio Gramazio
Ruggero Romagnoli
Maria Francesca Piacentini
Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back Squat
Applied Sciences
velocity based training
resistance training
velocity perception
velocity-loss perception
title Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back Squat
title_full Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back Squat
title_fullStr Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back Squat
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back Squat
title_short Temporal Stability and Practical Relevance of Velocity and Velocity-Loss Perception in Back Squat
title_sort temporal stability and practical relevance of velocity and velocity loss perception in back squat
topic velocity based training
resistance training
velocity perception
velocity-loss perception
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/13/7252
work_keys_str_mv AT emanueledellostritto temporalstabilityandpracticalrelevanceofvelocityandvelocitylossperceptioninbacksquat
AT antoniogramazio temporalstabilityandpracticalrelevanceofvelocityandvelocitylossperceptioninbacksquat
AT ruggeroromagnoli temporalstabilityandpracticalrelevanceofvelocityandvelocitylossperceptioninbacksquat
AT mariafrancescapiacentini temporalstabilityandpracticalrelevanceofvelocityandvelocitylossperceptioninbacksquat