Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy

ABSTRACT This article analyzes the BDS Phase III (BDS‐3) single point positioning (SPP) kinematic mode performance, under seven different dual‐frequency ionospheric free combinations (IFC), namely B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I, using the observation data of 84 sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xingli Sun, Jinjie Yao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Engineering Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70212
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839610702942175232
author Xingli Sun
Jinjie Yao
author_facet Xingli Sun
Jinjie Yao
author_sort Xingli Sun
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT This article analyzes the BDS Phase III (BDS‐3) single point positioning (SPP) kinematic mode performance, under seven different dual‐frequency ionospheric free combinations (IFC), namely B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I, using the observation data of 84 static multi‐GNSS experiment (MGEX) stations for 7 days. And the three coordinates are estimated each epoch as white noise. We have derived a detailed SPP model based on timing group delay (TGD) and inter‐signal correction (ISC) for IFC. Next, the BDS‐3's five signals are assessed in regard to carrier‐to‐noise density ratio (C/N0) and code multipath (MP), B2b exhibits the best data quality, with an average C/N0 of 44.51 dB‐Hz and the code MP value of 22.40 cm. The difference of C/N0 among BDS‐3 single frequency signal is not obvious. The average number of satellites for all seven different IFCs is between 8.45 and 8.56, and the average PDOP value is between 2.03 and 2.08. There is not much difference in the number of satellites and PDOP between different IFCs. The root mean square error (RMSE) was used to assess the SPP performance. The sorted order of SPP kinematic performance of dual‐frequency IFC, from best to worst, is B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I. The results show that the SPP kinematic accuracy of the B1C/B2a dual‐frequency IFC in the three directions of north, east, and up (NEU) is 0.70, 0.69, and 1.68 m, respectively, and B2b/B3I IFC is 3.63, 3.72, and 8.49 m, respectively. B1C/B2a has a positioning accuracy ~5 times better than B2b/B3I. If there are multiple IFC, it is recommended to use B1C/B2a in SPP.
format Article
id doaj-art-9c7f39bca1c64d9a832f65a0f215f5e6
institution Matheson Library
issn 2577-8196
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Engineering Reports
spelling doaj-art-9c7f39bca1c64d9a832f65a0f215f5e62025-07-29T05:31:23ZengWileyEngineering Reports2577-81962025-07-0177n/an/a10.1002/eng2.70212Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning AccuracyXingli Sun0Jinjie Yao1School of Information and Communication Engineering North University of China Taiyuan ChinaSchool of Information and Communication Engineering North University of China Taiyuan ChinaABSTRACT This article analyzes the BDS Phase III (BDS‐3) single point positioning (SPP) kinematic mode performance, under seven different dual‐frequency ionospheric free combinations (IFC), namely B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I, using the observation data of 84 static multi‐GNSS experiment (MGEX) stations for 7 days. And the three coordinates are estimated each epoch as white noise. We have derived a detailed SPP model based on timing group delay (TGD) and inter‐signal correction (ISC) for IFC. Next, the BDS‐3's five signals are assessed in regard to carrier‐to‐noise density ratio (C/N0) and code multipath (MP), B2b exhibits the best data quality, with an average C/N0 of 44.51 dB‐Hz and the code MP value of 22.40 cm. The difference of C/N0 among BDS‐3 single frequency signal is not obvious. The average number of satellites for all seven different IFCs is between 8.45 and 8.56, and the average PDOP value is between 2.03 and 2.08. There is not much difference in the number of satellites and PDOP between different IFCs. The root mean square error (RMSE) was used to assess the SPP performance. The sorted order of SPP kinematic performance of dual‐frequency IFC, from best to worst, is B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I. The results show that the SPP kinematic accuracy of the B1C/B2a dual‐frequency IFC in the three directions of north, east, and up (NEU) is 0.70, 0.69, and 1.68 m, respectively, and B2b/B3I IFC is 3.63, 3.72, and 8.49 m, respectively. B1C/B2a has a positioning accuracy ~5 times better than B2b/B3I. If there are multiple IFC, it is recommended to use B1C/B2a in SPP.https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70212BDS phase III (BDS‐3)code pseudorangeionospheric free combination (IFC)single point positioning (SPP)
spellingShingle Xingli Sun
Jinjie Yao
Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy
Engineering Reports
BDS phase III (BDS‐3)
code pseudorange
ionospheric free combination (IFC)
single point positioning (SPP)
title Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy
title_full Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy
title_short Performance Evaluation of the Dual‐Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS‐3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy
title_sort performance evaluation of the dual frequency ionospheric free combination on bds 3 single point positioning accuracy
topic BDS phase III (BDS‐3)
code pseudorange
ionospheric free combination (IFC)
single point positioning (SPP)
url https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70212
work_keys_str_mv AT xinglisun performanceevaluationofthedualfrequencyionosphericfreecombinationonbds3singlepointpositioningaccuracy
AT jinjieyao performanceevaluationofthedualfrequencyionosphericfreecombinationonbds3singlepointpositioningaccuracy