Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble

Abstract Recent studies reveal an anti‐correlation between global cloud feedback (CF) and effective radiative forcing due to aerosol‐cloud interaction (ERFaci) in Earth system models, but the physical mechanisms underlying it remain uncertain. Here we investigate how different turbulence representat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Qin, Po‐Lun Ma, Mark D. Zelinka, Stephen A. Klein, Tao Zhang, Xue Zheng, Vincent E. Larson, Meng Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004756
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839655216543170560
author Yi Qin
Po‐Lun Ma
Mark D. Zelinka
Stephen A. Klein
Tao Zhang
Xue Zheng
Vincent E. Larson
Meng Huang
author_facet Yi Qin
Po‐Lun Ma
Mark D. Zelinka
Stephen A. Klein
Tao Zhang
Xue Zheng
Vincent E. Larson
Meng Huang
author_sort Yi Qin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Recent studies reveal an anti‐correlation between global cloud feedback (CF) and effective radiative forcing due to aerosol‐cloud interaction (ERFaci) in Earth system models, but the physical mechanisms underlying it remain uncertain. Here we investigate how different turbulence representations contribute to this relationship over the global ocean using an ensemble of Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 simulations with perturbed turbulence parameters. The anti‐correlation appears only in the tropical ascent regime. In the Northern Hemisphere midlatitude and high latitude regimes, there is no significant correlation, and in the tropical marine low cloud and Southern Ocean regimes, the correlation is positive. These opposite correlations are primarily driven by opposing CF responses to perturbed parameters. We find that the mean‐state turbulent mixing strength affects both CF and ERFaci, enabling strong correlations in certain regimes. This study highlights the complex linkages between CF and ERFaci through turbulent processes across diverse cloud regimes.
format Article
id doaj-art-99e7fe238eb848c7a53e642f9cb3f8dd
institution Matheson Library
issn 1942-2466
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj-art-99e7fe238eb848c7a53e642f9cb3f8dd2025-06-25T12:59:05ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662025-06-01176n/an/a10.1029/2024MS004756Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter EnsembleYi Qin0Po‐Lun Ma1Mark D. Zelinka2Stephen A. Klein3Tao Zhang4Xue Zheng5Vincent E. Larson6Meng Huang7Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USALawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USALawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USABrookhaven National Laboratory Upton NY USALawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USAAbstract Recent studies reveal an anti‐correlation between global cloud feedback (CF) and effective radiative forcing due to aerosol‐cloud interaction (ERFaci) in Earth system models, but the physical mechanisms underlying it remain uncertain. Here we investigate how different turbulence representations contribute to this relationship over the global ocean using an ensemble of Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 simulations with perturbed turbulence parameters. The anti‐correlation appears only in the tropical ascent regime. In the Northern Hemisphere midlatitude and high latitude regimes, there is no significant correlation, and in the tropical marine low cloud and Southern Ocean regimes, the correlation is positive. These opposite correlations are primarily driven by opposing CF responses to perturbed parameters. We find that the mean‐state turbulent mixing strength affects both CF and ERFaci, enabling strong correlations in certain regimes. This study highlights the complex linkages between CF and ERFaci through turbulent processes across diverse cloud regimes.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004756cloud feedbackaerosol‐cloud interactionclimate change
spellingShingle Yi Qin
Po‐Lun Ma
Mark D. Zelinka
Stephen A. Klein
Tao Zhang
Xue Zheng
Vincent E. Larson
Meng Huang
Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
cloud feedback
aerosol‐cloud interaction
climate change
title Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble
title_full Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble
title_fullStr Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble
title_short Impact of Turbulence Representation on the Relationship Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in an E3SMv2 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble
title_sort impact of turbulence representation on the relationship between cloud feedback and aerosol cloud interaction in an e3smv2 perturbed parameter ensemble
topic cloud feedback
aerosol‐cloud interaction
climate change
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004756
work_keys_str_mv AT yiqin impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble
AT polunma impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble
AT markdzelinka impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble
AT stephenaklein impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble
AT taozhang impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble
AT xuezheng impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble
AT vincentelarson impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble
AT menghuang impactofturbulencerepresentationontherelationshipbetweencloudfeedbackandaerosolcloudinteractioninane3smv2perturbedparameterensemble