Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty

Aims: This study aimed to compare early outcomes of cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We analyzed 593 patients who underwent cemented or cementless TKA between January 2017 and December 2022. Data collected included demographics, BMI, comorbidities, surgical variables...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vadim Benkovich, Artsiom Abialevich, Vladislav Osinsky, Guy Benkovich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2025-06-01
Series:Bone & Joint Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0281.R1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839645705441902592
author Vadim Benkovich
Artsiom Abialevich
Vladislav Osinsky
Guy Benkovich
author_facet Vadim Benkovich
Artsiom Abialevich
Vladislav Osinsky
Guy Benkovich
author_sort Vadim Benkovich
collection DOAJ
description Aims: This study aimed to compare early outcomes of cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We analyzed 593 patients who underwent cemented or cementless TKA between January 2017 and December 2022. Data collected included demographics, BMI, comorbidities, surgical variables, follow-up duration, and outcomes such as implant survivorship, radiolucencies (assessed using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System (MKSRES)), short-term complications, revision rates, periprosthetic fractures, hospital length of stay, and readmissions. Results: The study included 593 patients, equally divided into cemented and cementless groups. Age (p = 0.354) and sex (p = 0.342) were similar, though BMI was higher in the cementless group (p < 0.001). Comorbidities were comparable. Radiolucencies and osteolysis occurred in 12 cemented and ten cementless cases, with no significant differences across femoral and tibial zones (p ≥ 0.479). All radiolucencies were stable, partial, and non-progressive. No cases of aseptic loosening required revision. Revisions for periprosthetic fractures were rare (p = 0.218). Hospital length of stay (p = 0.623) and readmissions (p = 0.216) were similar between groups. The mean follow-up time postoperatively was slightly longer in the cementless group (4.22 years (SD 0.84)) compared to the cemented group (4.01 years (SD 1.03)) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Cemented fixation remains the gold standard in TKA due to its reliability, yet advancements in implant design and indications support increasing adoption of cementless TKA. This study found comparable early outcomes for both methods, with stable radiolucent lines and no aseptic loosening during follow-up. The MKSRES facilitates standard radiological assessment, enabling precise implant monitoring and improving TKA outcome evaluation. These findings support the equivalence of cemented and cementless fixation in early survivorship. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(6):707–714.
format Article
id doaj-art-94ba9ef3b15b4e5fbae1e176651073f0
institution Matheson Library
issn 2633-1462
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format Article
series Bone & Joint Open
spelling doaj-art-94ba9ef3b15b4e5fbae1e176651073f02025-07-01T12:28:39ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Open2633-14622025-06-016670771410.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0281.R1Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplastyVadim Benkovich0Artsiom Abialevich1Vladislav Osinsky2Guy Benkovich3Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yafo, IsraelAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yafo, IsraelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Soroka Medical Center, Beer Sheva, IsraelAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yafo, IsraelAims: This study aimed to compare early outcomes of cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We analyzed 593 patients who underwent cemented or cementless TKA between January 2017 and December 2022. Data collected included demographics, BMI, comorbidities, surgical variables, follow-up duration, and outcomes such as implant survivorship, radiolucencies (assessed using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System (MKSRES)), short-term complications, revision rates, periprosthetic fractures, hospital length of stay, and readmissions. Results: The study included 593 patients, equally divided into cemented and cementless groups. Age (p = 0.354) and sex (p = 0.342) were similar, though BMI was higher in the cementless group (p < 0.001). Comorbidities were comparable. Radiolucencies and osteolysis occurred in 12 cemented and ten cementless cases, with no significant differences across femoral and tibial zones (p ≥ 0.479). All radiolucencies were stable, partial, and non-progressive. No cases of aseptic loosening required revision. Revisions for periprosthetic fractures were rare (p = 0.218). Hospital length of stay (p = 0.623) and readmissions (p = 0.216) were similar between groups. The mean follow-up time postoperatively was slightly longer in the cementless group (4.22 years (SD 0.84)) compared to the cemented group (4.01 years (SD 1.03)) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Cemented fixation remains the gold standard in TKA due to its reliability, yet advancements in implant design and indications support increasing adoption of cementless TKA. This study found comparable early outcomes for both methods, with stable radiolucent lines and no aseptic loosening during follow-up. The MKSRES facilitates standard radiological assessment, enabling precise implant monitoring and improving TKA outcome evaluation. These findings support the equivalence of cemented and cementless fixation in early survivorship. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(6):707–714.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0281.R1total knee arthroplastyknee society radiographic evaluation and scoring systemcementlessradiolucenciestotal knee arthroplasty (tka)cementless fixationkneesperiprosthetic fracturesradiolucent linesaseptic looseningcomorbiditiesosteolysisbmi
spellingShingle Vadim Benkovich
Artsiom Abialevich
Vladislav Osinsky
Guy Benkovich
Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty
Bone & Joint Open
total knee arthroplasty
knee society radiographic evaluation and scoring system
cementless
radiolucencies
total knee arthroplasty (tka)
cementless fixation
knees
periprosthetic fractures
radiolucent lines
aseptic loosening
comorbidities
osteolysis
bmi
title Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty
title_full Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty
title_short Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty
title_sort comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty
topic total knee arthroplasty
knee society radiographic evaluation and scoring system
cementless
radiolucencies
total knee arthroplasty (tka)
cementless fixation
knees
periprosthetic fractures
radiolucent lines
aseptic loosening
comorbidities
osteolysis
bmi
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0281.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT vadimbenkovich comparativeanalysisofearlyradiolucenciesincementlessversuscementedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT artsiomabialevich comparativeanalysisofearlyradiolucenciesincementlessversuscementedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT vladislavosinsky comparativeanalysisofearlyradiolucenciesincementlessversuscementedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT guybenkovich comparativeanalysisofearlyradiolucenciesincementlessversuscementedtotalkneearthroplasty