EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPY

Complete clinical response (determined by palpation, instrumental methods, and macroscopic examination) does not always imply the achievement of pathologic complete response. Correlation coefficient between complete clinical and complete pathologic responses is 0.6–0.7. Objective: to choose an optim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. О. Bashlyk, V. F. Semiglazov, A. G. Kudaybergenova, A. S. Artem’eva, T. Yu. Semiglazova, V. S. Chirskiy, A. V. Komyakho, P. V. Krivorot’ko, V. V. Klimenko, Sh. M. Khadzhimatova, A. I. Tseluyko, S. S. Ereschenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2018-04-01
Series:Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/574
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839570934754705408
author V. О. Bashlyk
V. F. Semiglazov
A. G. Kudaybergenova
A. S. Artem’eva
T. Yu. Semiglazova
V. S. Chirskiy
A. V. Komyakho
P. V. Krivorot’ko
V. V. Klimenko
Sh. M. Khadzhimatova
A. I. Tseluyko
S. S. Ereschenko
author_facet V. О. Bashlyk
V. F. Semiglazov
A. G. Kudaybergenova
A. S. Artem’eva
T. Yu. Semiglazova
V. S. Chirskiy
A. V. Komyakho
P. V. Krivorot’ko
V. V. Klimenko
Sh. M. Khadzhimatova
A. I. Tseluyko
S. S. Ereschenko
author_sort V. О. Bashlyk
collection DOAJ
description Complete clinical response (determined by palpation, instrumental methods, and macroscopic examination) does not always imply the achievement of pathologic complete response. Correlation coefficient between complete clinical and complete pathologic responses is 0.6–0.7. Objective: to choose an optimal method for the assessment of residual tumor that will provide objective information on the efficacy of various neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) regimens. Materials and methods. We investigated trepanobiopsy samples of breast tumors collected prior to NST initiation and tissue samples collected during surgery after NST completion. The following parameters were evaluated: tumor histological type, hormonal receptor status, Ki-67 and HER2 expression, tumor cell density and the dynamics of these parameters in response to NST. Therapeutic pathomorphosis was estimated using ypTNM, Miller–Payne and RCB grading systems. Results. We observed various changes in the immunophenotypic profiles of the tumors in response to NST: luminal B subtype (HER2–) can become luminal A subtype due to decreased Ki-67 level and triple negative due to the loss of hormone receptors expression; triple negative breast cancer can acquire expression of hormone receptors and become luminal B subtype (HER2–).Conclusion. Integral assessment of therapeutic pathomorphosis using various grading systems (Miller–Payne, ypTNM and RCB) provides objective information on the residual tumor status. Pathomorphological assessment of residual tumor is an important component in the initial evaluation of various NST regimens efficacy.
format Article
id doaj-art-93f7eb5ed98e4383b1d0c89035e85d4e
institution Matheson Library
issn 1994-4098
1999-8627
language Russian
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher ABV-press
record_format Article
series Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы
spelling doaj-art-93f7eb5ed98e4383b1d0c89035e85d4e2025-08-04T14:33:40ZrusABV-pressОпухоли женской репродуктивной системы1994-40981999-86272018-04-01141121910.17650/1994-4098-2018-14-1-12-19559EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPYV. О. Bashlyk0V. F. Semiglazov1A. G. Kudaybergenova2A. S. Artem’eva3T. Yu. Semiglazova4V. S. Chirskiy5A. V. Komyakho6P. V. Krivorot’ko7V. V. Klimenko8Sh. M. Khadzhimatova9A. I. Tseluyko10S. S. Ereschenko11N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaN.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaComplete clinical response (determined by palpation, instrumental methods, and macroscopic examination) does not always imply the achievement of pathologic complete response. Correlation coefficient between complete clinical and complete pathologic responses is 0.6–0.7. Objective: to choose an optimal method for the assessment of residual tumor that will provide objective information on the efficacy of various neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) regimens. Materials and methods. We investigated trepanobiopsy samples of breast tumors collected prior to NST initiation and tissue samples collected during surgery after NST completion. The following parameters were evaluated: tumor histological type, hormonal receptor status, Ki-67 and HER2 expression, tumor cell density and the dynamics of these parameters in response to NST. Therapeutic pathomorphosis was estimated using ypTNM, Miller–Payne and RCB grading systems. Results. We observed various changes in the immunophenotypic profiles of the tumors in response to NST: luminal B subtype (HER2–) can become luminal A subtype due to decreased Ki-67 level and triple negative due to the loss of hormone receptors expression; triple negative breast cancer can acquire expression of hormone receptors and become luminal B subtype (HER2–).Conclusion. Integral assessment of therapeutic pathomorphosis using various grading systems (Miller–Payne, ypTNM and RCB) provides objective information on the residual tumor status. Pathomorphological assessment of residual tumor is an important component in the initial evaluation of various NST regimens efficacy.https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/574breast cancerpathologic complete responseimmunophenotypic subtype of the tumoralteration of tumor subtype after treatmentcell densitymiller–payne grading systemrcb grading system
spellingShingle V. О. Bashlyk
V. F. Semiglazov
A. G. Kudaybergenova
A. S. Artem’eva
T. Yu. Semiglazova
V. S. Chirskiy
A. V. Komyakho
P. V. Krivorot’ko
V. V. Klimenko
Sh. M. Khadzhimatova
A. I. Tseluyko
S. S. Ereschenko
EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPY
Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы
breast cancer
pathologic complete response
immunophenotypic subtype of the tumor
alteration of tumor subtype after treatment
cell density
miller–payne grading system
rcb grading system
title EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPY
title_full EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPY
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPY
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPY
title_short EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHANGES OF BREAST CARCINOMAS AFTER NEOADJUVANT SYSTEMIC THERAPY
title_sort evaluation of morphological and immunohistochemical changes of breast carcinomas after neoadjuvant systemic therapy
topic breast cancer
pathologic complete response
immunophenotypic subtype of the tumor
alteration of tumor subtype after treatment
cell density
miller–payne grading system
rcb grading system
url https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/574
work_keys_str_mv AT vobashlyk evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT vfsemiglazov evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT agkudaybergenova evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT asartemeva evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT tyusemiglazova evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT vschirskiy evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT avkomyakho evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT pvkrivorotko evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT vvklimenko evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT shmkhadzhimatova evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT aitseluyko evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy
AT ssereschenko evaluationofmorphologicalandimmunohistochemicalchangesofbreastcarcinomasafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapy