Evaluation of the Effect of Different Soil Surface Treatments in the Vineyard Inter-Row on the CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions

In recent years, increasing efforts have been directed towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculturally managed soils to mitigate their negative environmental impacts. The total emissions released are influenced by the chosen farming practices, including soil surface treatment methods....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrik Burg, Vladimír Mašán, Petra Zabloudilová, Miroslav Češpiva, Jana Burgová, Jindřiška Jeřábková, Adam Lipinski, Piotr Markowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/7/1611
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In recent years, increasing efforts have been directed towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculturally managed soils to mitigate their negative environmental impacts. The total emissions released are influenced by the chosen farming practices, including soil surface treatment methods. While numerous studies have focused on arable cropping systems, research in permanent crops, such as vineyards, remains limited. For this reason, our study aimed to assess the effects of different soil surface management strategies in vineyard inter-rows on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Five treatments were examined: cultivation to a depth of 70 mm (C70); cultivation to a depth of 150 mm (C150); compost application (50 t·ha<sup>−1</sup>) incorporated into the soil at 150 mm depth (C+C150); mulching with plant residues left on the soil surface (M) and an untreated control (Co). Results from two-year measurements indicated the highest CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the C+C150 treatment (42–76% higher) and C150 (34–53% higher) compared to the control (Co). The impact of soil surface treatment on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions is further substantiated by cumulative values recorded over 120 days, ranging from 11–24 g C-CO<sub>2</sub>·m<sup>−2</sup>·h<sup>−1</sup>, corresponding to 9.64–21.03 Mg C-CO<sub>2</sub>·ha<sup>−1</sup>·y<sup>−1</sup>.
ISSN:2073-4395