Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department Students

Even before the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, people were continuously exposed to various naturally occurring radioactive materials, including radon. However, public awareness and understanding of this exposure remain limited. When communicating the risks of radiation exposure from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiromi Kudo, Masahiro Hosoda, Yasutaka Omori, Kazutaka Tanaka, Minoru Osanai, Takashi Ohba, Isamu Amir, Masaharu Tsubokura, Shinji Tokonami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Safety
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-576X/11/2/43
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839652781083852800
author Hiromi Kudo
Masahiro Hosoda
Yasutaka Omori
Kazutaka Tanaka
Minoru Osanai
Takashi Ohba
Isamu Amir
Masaharu Tsubokura
Shinji Tokonami
author_facet Hiromi Kudo
Masahiro Hosoda
Yasutaka Omori
Kazutaka Tanaka
Minoru Osanai
Takashi Ohba
Isamu Amir
Masaharu Tsubokura
Shinji Tokonami
author_sort Hiromi Kudo
collection DOAJ
description Even before the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, people were continuously exposed to various naturally occurring radioactive materials, including radon. However, public awareness and understanding of this exposure remain limited. When communicating the risks of radiation exposure from the Fukushima accident, explanatory materials have not typically incorporated data from coastal areas of Fukushima Prefecture collected after the incident to clarify the actual levels of artificial and natural radiation exposure. This study aimed to assess whether presenting radiation dose data from coastal areas of Fukushima Prefecture—using natural radiation as a reference point—could influence risk perception regarding the health effects of radiation exposure and its potential impact on future generations. The study focused on students enrolled in health science-related departments at Hirosaki University. Before being presented with the data, the students had limited understanding of radiation. However, after reviewing the explanatory materials, 89 students (48.4%) demonstrated an improved understanding of its potential impact on future generations, while 87 students (47.3%) showed increased awareness of the effects on their own health. Regarding the reduction in risk perception, many students attributed it to the fact that radiation levels 10 years after the Fukushima nuclear accident were not significantly different from natural background radiation in most areas. These findings suggest that providing actual radiation measurement data from affected areas can significantly influence risk perception and decision-making processes. The results indicate that participants became more aware of the presence of natural background radiation, and the comparison with current radiation levels in Fukushima played a key role in shaping their risk perception.
format Article
id doaj-art-86b62382fd6149b0a39aa7aa7f4b7d1a
institution Matheson Library
issn 2313-576X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Safety
spelling doaj-art-86b62382fd6149b0a39aa7aa7f4b7d1a2025-06-25T14:24:43ZengMDPI AGSafety2313-576X2025-05-011124310.3390/safety11020043Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department StudentsHiromi Kudo0Masahiro Hosoda1Yasutaka Omori2Kazutaka Tanaka3Minoru Osanai4Takashi Ohba5Isamu Amir6Masaharu Tsubokura7Shinji Tokonami8Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8564, JapanGraduate School of Health Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8564, JapanInstitute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8564, JapanInstitute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8564, JapanGraduate School of Health Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8564, JapanDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Health Sciences, Fukushima 960-8516, JapanDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanInstitute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8564, JapanEven before the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, people were continuously exposed to various naturally occurring radioactive materials, including radon. However, public awareness and understanding of this exposure remain limited. When communicating the risks of radiation exposure from the Fukushima accident, explanatory materials have not typically incorporated data from coastal areas of Fukushima Prefecture collected after the incident to clarify the actual levels of artificial and natural radiation exposure. This study aimed to assess whether presenting radiation dose data from coastal areas of Fukushima Prefecture—using natural radiation as a reference point—could influence risk perception regarding the health effects of radiation exposure and its potential impact on future generations. The study focused on students enrolled in health science-related departments at Hirosaki University. Before being presented with the data, the students had limited understanding of radiation. However, after reviewing the explanatory materials, 89 students (48.4%) demonstrated an improved understanding of its potential impact on future generations, while 87 students (47.3%) showed increased awareness of the effects on their own health. Regarding the reduction in risk perception, many students attributed it to the fact that radiation levels 10 years after the Fukushima nuclear accident were not significantly different from natural background radiation in most areas. These findings suggest that providing actual radiation measurement data from affected areas can significantly influence risk perception and decision-making processes. The results indicate that participants became more aware of the presence of natural background radiation, and the comparison with current radiation levels in Fukushima played a key role in shaping their risk perception.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-576X/11/2/43nuclear disasterradiation exposurerisk communicationbackground radiationhealth riskhereditary risk
spellingShingle Hiromi Kudo
Masahiro Hosoda
Yasutaka Omori
Kazutaka Tanaka
Minoru Osanai
Takashi Ohba
Isamu Amir
Masaharu Tsubokura
Shinji Tokonami
Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department Students
Safety
nuclear disaster
radiation exposure
risk communication
background radiation
health risk
hereditary risk
title Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department Students
title_full Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department Students
title_fullStr Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department Students
title_full_unstemmed Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department Students
title_short Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Communication Materials Using Natural Radiation Levels as a Reference Standard: Results from a Survey of First-Year Health Department Students
title_sort verification of the effectiveness of risk communication materials using natural radiation levels as a reference standard results from a survey of first year health department students
topic nuclear disaster
radiation exposure
risk communication
background radiation
health risk
hereditary risk
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-576X/11/2/43
work_keys_str_mv AT hiromikudo verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT masahirohosoda verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT yasutakaomori verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT kazutakatanaka verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT minoruosanai verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT takashiohba verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT isamuamir verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT masaharutsubokura verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents
AT shinjitokonami verificationoftheeffectivenessofriskcommunicationmaterialsusingnaturalradiationlevelsasareferencestandardresultsfromasurveyoffirstyearhealthdepartmentstudents