A Study on the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Malposition in Chuna Manual Therapy Using X-Ray Images Based on Digital Markers

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate digital markers and establish quantitative diagnostic criteria for spinal malpositions in Chuna manual therapy using lumbar X-rays. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 2000 X-ray images were collected from adult patients at th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min-Su Ju, Tae-Yong Park, Minho Choi, Younseok Ko, Young Cheol Na, Yeong Ha Jeong, Jun-Su Jang, Jin-Hyun Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/14/1748
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate digital markers and establish quantitative diagnostic criteria for spinal malpositions in Chuna manual therapy using lumbar X-rays. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 2000 X-ray images were collected from adult patients at the International St. Mary’s Hospital of Catholic Kwandong University. Five Chuna manual medicine experts annotated anatomical landmarks using a digital marker labeling program and diagnosed three types of spinal malpositions: flexion/extension, lateral bending, and rotation. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using weighted F1 (F1_W) scores, and the optimal threshold values for each malposition type were determined based on maximum F1_W performance. <b>Results:</b> The results showed high diagnostic performance, with average maximum F1_W scores of 0.76 for flexion/extension, 0.85 for lateral bending, and 0.71 for rotation. Based on this analysis, threshold angles for each type of spinal malposition in Chuna manual diagnosis were determined. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrates the diagnostic validity of digital marker-based X-ray analysis in Chuna manual therapy and is the first to propose quantitative diagnostic thresholds for spinal malpositions. These findings may serve as a foundation for clinical application in spinal assessment and treatment planning, with further validation studies warranted.
ISSN:2075-4418