Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
<h4>Background</h4>A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised set of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all effectiveness trials for a specific health area. This will allow results of studies to be compared, contrasted and combined as appropriate, as well as...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Elizabeth Gargon, Binu Gurung, Nancy Medley, Doug G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Paula R Williamson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099111 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.
by: Katherine Davis, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.
by: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Adverse drug reactions in children--a systematic review.
by: Rebecca Mary Diane Smyth, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Assessment of contraceptive morbidity: Associated factors, and its role in further contraceptive utilization – An analytical cross-sectional study from the field practice area of a medical college in Sikkim, India
by: Aeleesha Rai, et al.
Published: (2025-09-01) -
Aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review of the balance of evidence from reviews of randomized trials.
by: Paul Sutcliffe, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)