Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin

The “identity of subject and object” is one of the few issues that has been met with the disagreement of two great philosophers. Abu Ali as the main denial and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin as a serious proponent. Bu Ali rejects identity of subject and object in “The Book of Healing” and “Al-Isharat” bu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jalil Muhammadi Khanghah, Abdullah Nasri
Format: Article
Language:Persian
Published: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:آموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_519_1e746de817cfcd410697a5c9c751e317.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839608415315296256
author Jalil Muhammadi Khanghah
Abdullah Nasri
author_facet Jalil Muhammadi Khanghah
Abdullah Nasri
author_sort Jalil Muhammadi Khanghah
collection DOAJ
description The “identity of subject and object” is one of the few issues that has been met with the disagreement of two great philosophers. Abu Ali as the main denial and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin as a serious proponent. Bu Ali rejects identity of subject and object in “The Book of Healing” and “Al-Isharat” but argues in “The Book of Al-Mab-da and Al-Ma'ada” (The Book of Origin and Resurrection). This difference in the approach of Bu Ali has been questioned by later philosophers. Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin mentions three meanings for “unity” and argues that “identity of subject and object” cannot be substantiated in the first two sense by the same argument of Bu Ali, but the third meaning of unity is not only possible but it is also the realization of science at all levels. Sadra says that Bouali accepted the third meaning of unity only in “The Book of Al-Mab-da and Al-Ma'ada” (The Book of Origin and Resurrection), and then doubted that he would obtain the original view of Bu Ali. But the truth is that Boali has never spoken contradictory. But the truth is that Bo Ali has never spoken contradictory. It is not permissible to state his true view in “The Book of Healing” and “Al-Isharat” and to speak in “The Book of Al-Mab-da and Al-Ma'ada” (The Book of Origin and Resurrection) according to the philosophers. Understanding Bu Ali’s main point of view is only in the light of a detailed understanding of his system of thought which is the way we have come and have showed is the third meaning of unity that is the permanent belief of Bu Ali, and there is basically no difference between Bu Ali and Mulla Sadra.
format Article
id doaj-art-7ecea670fbda4c6faa68b5ab8a40f43f
institution Matheson Library
issn 2251-9386
2783-4026
language fas
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
record_format Article
series آموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي
spelling doaj-art-7ecea670fbda4c6faa68b5ab8a40f43f2025-07-31T10:29:49ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي2251-93862783-40262020-01-011425123148519Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehinJalil Muhammadi Khanghah0Abdullah Nasri1PhD student of Islamic Philosophy & TheologyAssociate professor at Allameh Tabataba'i UniversityThe “identity of subject and object” is one of the few issues that has been met with the disagreement of two great philosophers. Abu Ali as the main denial and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin as a serious proponent. Bu Ali rejects identity of subject and object in “The Book of Healing” and “Al-Isharat” but argues in “The Book of Al-Mab-da and Al-Ma'ada” (The Book of Origin and Resurrection). This difference in the approach of Bu Ali has been questioned by later philosophers. Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin mentions three meanings for “unity” and argues that “identity of subject and object” cannot be substantiated in the first two sense by the same argument of Bu Ali, but the third meaning of unity is not only possible but it is also the realization of science at all levels. Sadra says that Bouali accepted the third meaning of unity only in “The Book of Al-Mab-da and Al-Ma'ada” (The Book of Origin and Resurrection), and then doubted that he would obtain the original view of Bu Ali. But the truth is that Boali has never spoken contradictory. But the truth is that Bo Ali has never spoken contradictory. It is not permissible to state his true view in “The Book of Healing” and “Al-Isharat” and to speak in “The Book of Al-Mab-da and Al-Ma'ada” (The Book of Origin and Resurrection) according to the philosophers. Understanding Bu Ali’s main point of view is only in the light of a detailed understanding of his system of thought which is the way we have come and have showed is the third meaning of unity that is the permanent belief of Bu Ali, and there is basically no difference between Bu Ali and Mulla Sadra.https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_519_1e746de817cfcd410697a5c9c751e317.pdfunitypossessor of intellectobject of intellectionbo alisadr-ol-mote'allehin
spellingShingle Jalil Muhammadi Khanghah
Abdullah Nasri
Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin
آموزه‌‌های فلسفه اسلامي
unity
possessor of intellect
object of intellection
bo ali
sadr-ol-mote'allehin
title Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin
title_full Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin
title_fullStr Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin
title_full_unstemmed Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin
title_short Identity of Subject and Object in the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin
title_sort identity of subject and object in the view of ibn sina and sadr ol mote allehin
topic unity
possessor of intellect
object of intellection
bo ali
sadr-ol-mote'allehin
url https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_519_1e746de817cfcd410697a5c9c751e317.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jalilmuhammadikhanghah identityofsubjectandobjectintheviewofibnsinaandsadrolmoteallehin
AT abdullahnasri identityofsubjectandobjectintheviewofibnsinaandsadrolmoteallehin