Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for Caregiving

Abstract INTRODUCTION A substantial number of evidence‐based dementia caregiving support programs positively impact family and friend caregivers. Researchers and service organizations have successfully translated and delivered a subset of these programs to caregivers and are included in Best Program...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morgan J. Minyo, Sara M. Powers, David M. Bass, Rachel M. Cannon, Katie Maslow, Zoe F. Fete, Megan K. Huth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70092
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839651385386205184
author Morgan J. Minyo
Sara M. Powers
David M. Bass
Rachel M. Cannon
Katie Maslow
Zoe F. Fete
Megan K. Huth
author_facet Morgan J. Minyo
Sara M. Powers
David M. Bass
Rachel M. Cannon
Katie Maslow
Zoe F. Fete
Megan K. Huth
author_sort Morgan J. Minyo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract INTRODUCTION A substantial number of evidence‐based dementia caregiving support programs positively impact family and friend caregivers. Researchers and service organizations have successfully translated and delivered a subset of these programs to caregivers and are included in Best Programs for Caregiving (BPC). This investigation examined the programmatic caregiver research outcomes reported in peer‐reviewed articles of BPC programs to understand how programs impact caregivers in the community and identify underrepresented outcomes. METHODS Peer‐reviewed, published research articles that (1) reported at least one dementia caregiver outcome, and (2) used a controlled trial or pre/posttest study design were abstracted from the BPC database. Across 45 evidence‐based programs in BPC, 128 articles met inclusion criteria for data coding and descriptive analysis. Research outcomes (e.g., stress, depressive symptoms), efficacy findings (e.g., beneficial, no effect), and the type of study design used (e.g., pre/posttest, treatment/control) were coded from each article. RESULTS Twelve programmatic outcomes were identified focusing on Caregiver Well‐Being and Caregiver Support. Caregiver Well‐Being outcomes were frequently assessed by BPC programs, including symptoms of depression, reported in 81 (63.3%) articles, and care‐related stress, strain, and/or burden, reported in 75 (58.6%) articles. By comparison, Caregiver Support outcomes were infrequently measured including quantity of family/friend support, reported in 17 (13.3%) articles, and quantity of community service use, reported in 13 (10.2%) articles. High percentages of beneficial findings were reported for both Caregiver Well‐Being and Caregiver Support outcomes. Articles reported beneficial findings using pre/posttest and treatment/control group designs similarly across caregiver outcomes. DISCUSSION The majority of BPC programs positively impact caregiver well‐being outcomes but limited attention is given to other person‐centered and strength‐based research outcomes including supports for caregivers, unmet needs, and positive aspects of caregiving. Additional research is needed by both established and new non‐pharmacological caregiving interventions to target and evaluate the impact of these underrepresented outcomes. Highlights Best Programs for Caregiving is an online database of dementia caregiving programs. BPC programs mainly target deficit‐focused, medical‐based, well‐being outcomes. Few BPC programs target positive aspects of caregiving and service use outcomes. More research is needed to evaluate underrepresented caregiver outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-7abd48f36a184d60a3c08b55723c9d25
institution Matheson Library
issn 2352-8737
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
spelling doaj-art-7abd48f36a184d60a3c08b55723c9d252025-06-26T06:30:48ZengWileyAlzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions2352-87372025-04-01112n/an/a10.1002/trc2.70092Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for CaregivingMorgan J. Minyo0Sara M. Powers1David M. Bass2Rachel M. Cannon3Katie Maslow4Zoe F. Fete5Megan K. Huth6Benjamin Rose Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Cleveland Ohio USABenjamin Rose Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Cleveland Ohio USABenjamin Rose Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Cleveland Ohio USABenjamin Rose Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Cleveland Ohio USABenjamin Rose Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Cleveland Ohio USABenjamin Rose Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Cleveland Ohio USABenjamin Rose Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Cleveland Ohio USAAbstract INTRODUCTION A substantial number of evidence‐based dementia caregiving support programs positively impact family and friend caregivers. Researchers and service organizations have successfully translated and delivered a subset of these programs to caregivers and are included in Best Programs for Caregiving (BPC). This investigation examined the programmatic caregiver research outcomes reported in peer‐reviewed articles of BPC programs to understand how programs impact caregivers in the community and identify underrepresented outcomes. METHODS Peer‐reviewed, published research articles that (1) reported at least one dementia caregiver outcome, and (2) used a controlled trial or pre/posttest study design were abstracted from the BPC database. Across 45 evidence‐based programs in BPC, 128 articles met inclusion criteria for data coding and descriptive analysis. Research outcomes (e.g., stress, depressive symptoms), efficacy findings (e.g., beneficial, no effect), and the type of study design used (e.g., pre/posttest, treatment/control) were coded from each article. RESULTS Twelve programmatic outcomes were identified focusing on Caregiver Well‐Being and Caregiver Support. Caregiver Well‐Being outcomes were frequently assessed by BPC programs, including symptoms of depression, reported in 81 (63.3%) articles, and care‐related stress, strain, and/or burden, reported in 75 (58.6%) articles. By comparison, Caregiver Support outcomes were infrequently measured including quantity of family/friend support, reported in 17 (13.3%) articles, and quantity of community service use, reported in 13 (10.2%) articles. High percentages of beneficial findings were reported for both Caregiver Well‐Being and Caregiver Support outcomes. Articles reported beneficial findings using pre/posttest and treatment/control group designs similarly across caregiver outcomes. DISCUSSION The majority of BPC programs positively impact caregiver well‐being outcomes but limited attention is given to other person‐centered and strength‐based research outcomes including supports for caregivers, unmet needs, and positive aspects of caregiving. Additional research is needed by both established and new non‐pharmacological caregiving interventions to target and evaluate the impact of these underrepresented outcomes. Highlights Best Programs for Caregiving is an online database of dementia caregiving programs. BPC programs mainly target deficit‐focused, medical‐based, well‐being outcomes. Few BPC programs target positive aspects of caregiving and service use outcomes. More research is needed to evaluate underrepresented caregiver outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70092caregiving outcomescaregiver supportdementia caregivingevidence‐based programs
spellingShingle Morgan J. Minyo
Sara M. Powers
David M. Bass
Rachel M. Cannon
Katie Maslow
Zoe F. Fete
Megan K. Huth
Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for Caregiving
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
caregiving outcomes
caregiver support
dementia caregiving
evidence‐based programs
title Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for Caregiving
title_full Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for Caregiving
title_fullStr Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for Caregiving
title_full_unstemmed Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for Caregiving
title_short Programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence‐base of dementia caregiving support programs: An analysis of Best Programs for Caregiving
title_sort programmatic research outcomes used to establish the evidence base of dementia caregiving support programs an analysis of best programs for caregiving
topic caregiving outcomes
caregiver support
dementia caregiving
evidence‐based programs
url https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70092
work_keys_str_mv AT morganjminyo programmaticresearchoutcomesusedtoestablishtheevidencebaseofdementiacaregivingsupportprogramsananalysisofbestprogramsforcaregiving
AT sarampowers programmaticresearchoutcomesusedtoestablishtheevidencebaseofdementiacaregivingsupportprogramsananalysisofbestprogramsforcaregiving
AT davidmbass programmaticresearchoutcomesusedtoestablishtheevidencebaseofdementiacaregivingsupportprogramsananalysisofbestprogramsforcaregiving
AT rachelmcannon programmaticresearchoutcomesusedtoestablishtheevidencebaseofdementiacaregivingsupportprogramsananalysisofbestprogramsforcaregiving
AT katiemaslow programmaticresearchoutcomesusedtoestablishtheevidencebaseofdementiacaregivingsupportprogramsananalysisofbestprogramsforcaregiving
AT zoeffete programmaticresearchoutcomesusedtoestablishtheevidencebaseofdementiacaregivingsupportprogramsananalysisofbestprogramsforcaregiving
AT megankhuth programmaticresearchoutcomesusedtoestablishtheevidencebaseofdementiacaregivingsupportprogramsananalysisofbestprogramsforcaregiving