Significance of Spring Inflow to Great Salt Lake, Utah, U.S.A.

Spring waters (n = 103) from locations surrounding Great Salt Lake (GSL) were mapped, collected, and analyzed to determine their chemical compositions. A ternary Ca-SO<sub>4</sub>-alkalinity plot was used to group these waters into compositional types based on the principle of chemical d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren E. Bunce, Tim K. Lowenstein, Elliot Jagniecki, David Collins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Hydrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/12/6/159
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Spring waters (n = 103) from locations surrounding Great Salt Lake (GSL) were mapped, collected, and analyzed to determine their chemical compositions. A ternary Ca-SO<sub>4</sub>-alkalinity plot was used to group these waters into compositional types based on the principle of chemical divides. Different spring water types were mixed with Bear, Jordan, and Weber River waters to determine the amount of spring inflow needed to reproduce the chemical composition of GSL. The Pitzer-based computer program EQL/EVP was used to simulate evaporation of spring-river water mixtures. The goal was to find spring-river water mixtures that, when evaporated, reproduced the chemical composition of modern GSL. This approach yielded GSL brine composition from a starting mixture of 12% spring inflow and 88% river water, by volume. The calculated spring inflow–river water mixture contains, on a molar percentage basis, greater than 50% of the B, K, Li, Na, and Cl supplied by springs and greater than 50% of the Ba, Ca, Sr, SO<sub>4</sub>, and alkalinity derived from rivers. Understanding GSL spring inflow and brine evolution as lake elevation drops is critical to lake environments, ecosystems, and industrial brine shrimp harvesting and mineral extraction.
ISSN:2306-5338