The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s Play

Young children’s play needs toys, which are its object support and the main tools. Character toys are of particular importance the function of which is the substitution of a character, the embodiment of a role. New technical capabilities make it possible to create complex robotic toys capable of lea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryabkova I.A., Pavlovskaia D.V., Sheina E.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2022-12-01
Series:Психолого-педагогические исследования
Subjects:
Online Access:https://psyjournals.ru/en/journals/psyedu/archive/2022_n4/Ryabkova_et_al
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839600776110931968
author Ryabkova I.A.
Pavlovskaia D.V.
Sheina E.G.
author_facet Ryabkova I.A.
Pavlovskaia D.V.
Sheina E.G.
author_sort Ryabkova I.A.
collection DOAJ
description Young children’s play needs toys, which are its object support and the main tools. Character toys are of particular importance the function of which is the substitution of a character, the embodiment of a role. New technical capabilities make it possible to create complex robotic toys capable of learning, autonomous movement, and reactions to interaction with them. However, the play potential of these toys has not been sufficiently studied. The purpose of this research is to study whether young children (3-4 years old) will play with a robot toy and whether this play will differ from playing with ordinary character toys. The work of P. Kahn et al. was used as the methodological basis of this research. The study included observing a play with two types of toys – a robotic and a stuffed dinosaur, a structured interview, and a classification of cards. The sample consisted of 30 children attending a state kindergarten. The results showed that children are significantly less likely and more monotonous to play with a robotic toy than with a traditional one. At the same time, they interact more with a robotic toy, study it more and are afraid of it as a living being. The results obtained allow us to raise the question of the category of this type of toy: they belong to robots but not to character toys.
format Article
id doaj-art-78943325ae2e42feadb5f3b57500d16c
institution Matheson Library
issn 2587-6139
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
record_format Article
series Психолого-педагогические исследования
spelling doaj-art-78943325ae2e42feadb5f3b57500d16c2025-08-02T11:33:42ZengMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationПсихолого-педагогические исследования2587-61392022-12-01144173510.17759/psyedu.2022140402The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s PlayRyabkova I.A.0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-0432Pavlovskaia D.V.1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-343XSheina E.G.2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3723-812XMoscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, Young children’s play needs toys, which are its object support and the main tools. Character toys are of particular importance the function of which is the substitution of a character, the embodiment of a role. New technical capabilities make it possible to create complex robotic toys capable of learning, autonomous movement, and reactions to interaction with them. However, the play potential of these toys has not been sufficiently studied. The purpose of this research is to study whether young children (3-4 years old) will play with a robot toy and whether this play will differ from playing with ordinary character toys. The work of P. Kahn et al. was used as the methodological basis of this research. The study included observing a play with two types of toys – a robotic and a stuffed dinosaur, a structured interview, and a classification of cards. The sample consisted of 30 children attending a state kindergarten. The results showed that children are significantly less likely and more monotonous to play with a robotic toy than with a traditional one. At the same time, they interact more with a robotic toy, study it more and are afraid of it as a living being. The results obtained allow us to raise the question of the category of this type of toy: they belong to robots but not to character toys. https://psyjournals.ru/en/journals/psyedu/archive/2022_n4/Ryabkova_et_alchildren’s playchildren’s toyscharacter toysrobotic petsrepresentations of preschoolerspreschoolersrobotic dinosaur pleo
spellingShingle Ryabkova I.A.
Pavlovskaia D.V.
Sheina E.G.
The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s Play
Психолого-педагогические исследования
children’s play
children’s toys
character toys
robotic pets
representations of preschoolers
preschoolers
robotic dinosaur pleo
title The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s Play
title_full The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s Play
title_fullStr The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s Play
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s Play
title_short The Impact of Traditional and Robotic Toys on 3-4 Years Old’s Play
title_sort impact of traditional and robotic toys on 3 4 years old s play
topic children’s play
children’s toys
character toys
robotic pets
representations of preschoolers
preschoolers
robotic dinosaur pleo
url https://psyjournals.ru/en/journals/psyedu/archive/2022_n4/Ryabkova_et_al
work_keys_str_mv AT ryabkovaia theimpactoftraditionalandrobotictoyson34yearsoldsplay
AT pavlovskaiadv theimpactoftraditionalandrobotictoyson34yearsoldsplay
AT sheinaeg theimpactoftraditionalandrobotictoyson34yearsoldsplay
AT ryabkovaia impactoftraditionalandrobotictoyson34yearsoldsplay
AT pavlovskaiadv impactoftraditionalandrobotictoyson34yearsoldsplay
AT sheinaeg impactoftraditionalandrobotictoyson34yearsoldsplay