Development and validation of a Comprehensive Hematological Scoring System for predicting overall survival in patients with soft tissue sarcomas: a comparison with NLR and PLR

Development and validation of a Comprehensive Hematological Scoring System for predicting overall survival in patients with soft tissue sarcomas: a comparison with NLR and PLR

BackgroundSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with high relapse/metastasis risks and limited treatment efficacy. Current biomarkers like neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) lack comprehensive prognostic value due to their reliance on limited hemat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying Qiu, Jiquan Liu, Shuang Chai, Lili Liu, Longqing Li, Yan Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
soft tissue sarcoma (STS)
Comprehensive Hematological Scoring System (CHSS)
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
prognosis
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1505485/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with high relapse/metastasis risks and limited treatment efficacy. Current biomarkers like neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) lack comprehensive prognostic value due to their reliance on limited hematological parameters.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 206 STS patients (2016–2023) to develop a Composite Hematological Scoring System (CHSS) integrating 19 pretreatment markers. LASSO regression selected key variables (glucose, CRP, LDL-C, HDL-C, albumin, platelets, hemoglobin, lymphocytes), weighted by coefficients. CHSS’s prognostic performance was compared to NLR/PLR via Kaplan-Meier, time-dependent ROC, and Cox regression analyses. A nomogram combining CHSS with clinical variables was validated using C-index, calibration, and decision curves.ResultsCHSS outperformed NLR/PLR in predicting overall survival (OS) across all timepoints. High CHSS patients had significantly worse OS (HR=6.197, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed CHSS, age, tumor size, and FNCLCC grade as independent predictors. The CHSS-based nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.79, with accurate 3-/5-year OS calibration.ConclusionCHSS integrates inflammation, metabolism, and nutrition markers to provide superior prognostic stratification for STS patients compared to NLR/PLR. Its integration into a nomogram supports personalized management, though multicenter validation is needed.
ISSN:2234-943X

Similar Items