Antibody Responses Following Primary Immunization with the Recombinant Herpes Zoster Vaccine (Shingrix<sup>®</sup>) in VZV Seronegative Immunocompromised Adults

<b>Background:</b> Immunocompromised patients are at risk of severe varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection and reactivation. In VZV seronegative immunocompromised persons, live-attenuated VZV vaccination is contraindicated, thus the recombinant herpes zoster vaccine (rHZV) remains a safe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Wessely, Ines Zwazl, Melita Poturica, Lukas Weseslindtner, Michael Kundi, Ursula Wiedermann, Angelika Wagner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Vaccines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/7/737
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<b>Background:</b> Immunocompromised patients are at risk of severe varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection and reactivation. In VZV seronegative immunocompromised persons, live-attenuated VZV vaccination is contraindicated, thus the recombinant herpes zoster vaccine (rHZV) remains a safe alternative, although an off-label application. Yet, data on the induction of a VZV-specific immune response in immunocompromised individuals with VZV-specific IgG below the assay’s cut-off are only available for patients after solid-organ transplantation (SOT). <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed the induction of VZV-specific IgG antibody levels after vaccination with rHZV in immunocompromised patients who previously tested anti-VZV-IgG negative between March 2018 and January 2024. <b>Results</b>: Of 952 vaccinees screened that received 2 or 3 doses rHZV, depending on the underlying disease, 33 patients (median age 53.0; 51.5% female) with either hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (82%) or high-grade immunosuppressive treatment (18%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Upon rHZV vaccination, 88% (29/33) individuals mounted a significant antibody response exceeding the assay’s cut-off level for seropositivity (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). We detected higher geometric mean antibody concentrations after three compared to two doses. However, 12% remained below the assay’s cut-off level and were therefore considered non-responsive. <b>Conclusions</b>: The rHZV is immunogenic in VZV-seronegative immunocompromised individuals and therefore presents a valid option to induce seroconversion. However, antibody testing in high-risk groups should be considered to identify humoral non- and low responders.
ISSN:2076-393X