Investigating the Influence of the Weed Layer on Crop Canopy Reflectance and LAI Inversion Using Simulations and Measurements in a Sugarcane Field
Recent research in agricultural remote sensing mainly focuses on how soil background affects canopy reflectance and the inversion of LAI, while often overlooking the influence of the weed layer. The coexistence of crop and weed layers forms two-layered vegetation canopies in tall crops such as sugar...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Remote Sensing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/12/2014 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Recent research in agricultural remote sensing mainly focuses on how soil background affects canopy reflectance and the inversion of LAI, while often overlooking the influence of the weed layer. The coexistence of crop and weed layers forms two-layered vegetation canopies in tall crops such as sugarcane and maize. Although radiative transfer models can simulate the weed layer’s influence on canopy reflectance and LAI inversion, few experimental investigations use in situ measurement data to verify these effects. Here, we propose a practical background modification scheme in which black material with near-zero reflectance covers the weed layer and alters the background spectrum of crop canopies. We conduct an experimental investigation in a sugarcane field with different background properties (i.e., bare soil and a weed layer). Tower-based and UAV-based hyperspectral measurements examine the spectral differences in sugarcane canopies with and without the black covering. We then use LAI measurements to evaluate the weed layer’s impact on LAI inversion from UAV-based hyperspectral data through a hybrid inversion method. We find that the weed layer significantly affects the canopy reflectance spectrum, changing it by 13.58% and 42.53% in the near-infrared region for tower-based and UAV-based measurements, respectively. Furthermore, the weed layer substantially interferes with LAI inversion of sugarcane canopies, causing significant overestimation. Estimated LAIs of sugarcane canopies with a soil background generally align well with measured values (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.69 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>), whereas those with a weed background are considerably overestimated (RMSE = 2.07 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>). We suggest that this practical background modification scheme quantifies the weed layer’s influence on crop canopy reflectance from a measurement perspective and that the weed layer should be considered during the inversion of crop LAI. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2072-4292 |