THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNE

Challenges in cancer detection, prognosis and management are currently being solved by determining circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The assessment of this marker has acquired particular importance in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the systemic treatment of which depends on the RAS gene status, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. I. Sluzhev, V. V. Semiglazov, T. Yu. Semiglazova, E. V. Tkachenko, S. A. Protsenko, D. Kh. Latipova, S. V. Kondratev, N. A. Brish, Yu. V. Alekseeva, A. M. Belyaev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk National Research Medical Center 2021-10-01
Series:Сибирский онкологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1928
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839579505585291264
author M. I. Sluzhev
V. V. Semiglazov
T. Yu. Semiglazova
E. V. Tkachenko
S. A. Protsenko
D. Kh. Latipova
S. V. Kondratev
N. A. Brish
Yu. V. Alekseeva
A. M. Belyaev
author_facet M. I. Sluzhev
V. V. Semiglazov
T. Yu. Semiglazova
E. V. Tkachenko
S. A. Protsenko
D. Kh. Latipova
S. V. Kondratev
N. A. Brish
Yu. V. Alekseeva
A. M. Belyaev
author_sort M. I. Sluzhev
collection DOAJ
description Challenges in cancer detection, prognosis and management are currently being solved by determining circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The assessment of this marker has acquired particular importance in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the systemic treatment of which depends on the RAS gene status, which has prognostic and predictive value. However, the possibilities of taking samples from the primary or metastatic lesion for pathomorphological and molecular analysis in CRC are often limited. The determination of ctDNA using liquid biopsy has an advantage over standard biopsy due to its low invasiveness and high availability of the method. Analysis of mutations using ctDNA as well as changes in the level of this marker is a criterion for the effectiveness of systemic treatment, as well as a factor that determines the risk of disease progression. Currently, the potential of using ctDNA to monitor effectiveness of first-and second-line chemotherapy, as well as to predict the development of secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors (cetuximab and panitumumab) in the first-line treatment and assessment of RAS status for returning to therapy with EGFR inhibitors in the third-line treatment of mCRC is being studied. Several pilot studies have provided evidence of the efficacy of EGFR re-treatment. The modern literature data published in leading peer-reviewed journals in Russian and international scientific citation databases, such as Medline, Elibrary, and PubMed were analyzed. Of the 138 analyzed publications, 56 were used to write this review.
format Article
id doaj-art-7316d304819a481aadb5af0b7ed88cbc
institution Matheson Library
issn 1814-4861
2312-3168
language Russian
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
record_format Article
series Сибирский онкологический журнал
spelling doaj-art-7316d304819a481aadb5af0b7ed88cbc2025-08-04T10:33:41ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk National Research Medical CenterСибирский онкологический журнал1814-48612312-31682021-10-0120514916110.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-5-149-161912THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNEM. I. Sluzhev0V. V. Semiglazov1T. Yu. Semiglazova2E. V. Tkachenko3S. A. Protsenko4D. Kh. Latipova5S. V. Kondratev6N. A. Brish7Yu. V. Alekseeva8A. M. Belyaev9N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology; I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of OncologyN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of OncologyN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of OncologyN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of OncologyN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of OncologyN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of OncologyN.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology; I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityChallenges in cancer detection, prognosis and management are currently being solved by determining circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The assessment of this marker has acquired particular importance in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the systemic treatment of which depends on the RAS gene status, which has prognostic and predictive value. However, the possibilities of taking samples from the primary or metastatic lesion for pathomorphological and molecular analysis in CRC are often limited. The determination of ctDNA using liquid biopsy has an advantage over standard biopsy due to its low invasiveness and high availability of the method. Analysis of mutations using ctDNA as well as changes in the level of this marker is a criterion for the effectiveness of systemic treatment, as well as a factor that determines the risk of disease progression. Currently, the potential of using ctDNA to monitor effectiveness of first-and second-line chemotherapy, as well as to predict the development of secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors (cetuximab and panitumumab) in the first-line treatment and assessment of RAS status for returning to therapy with EGFR inhibitors in the third-line treatment of mCRC is being studied. Several pilot studies have provided evidence of the efficacy of EGFR re-treatment. The modern literature data published in leading peer-reviewed journals in Russian and international scientific citation databases, such as Medline, Elibrary, and PubMed were analyzed. Of the 138 analyzed publications, 56 were used to write this review.https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1928metastatic colorectal cancercirculating tumor dnaras mutationsegfr inhibitors
spellingShingle M. I. Sluzhev
V. V. Semiglazov
T. Yu. Semiglazova
E. V. Tkachenko
S. A. Protsenko
D. Kh. Latipova
S. V. Kondratev
N. A. Brish
Yu. V. Alekseeva
A. M. Belyaev
THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNE
Сибирский онкологический журнал
metastatic colorectal cancer
circulating tumor dna
ras mutations
egfr inhibitors
title THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNE
title_full THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNE
title_fullStr THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNE
title_full_unstemmed THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNE
title_short THE IMPORTANCE OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT EFFECTIVNE
title_sort importance of circulating tumor dna in the assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment effectivne
topic metastatic colorectal cancer
circulating tumor dna
ras mutations
egfr inhibitors
url https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1928
work_keys_str_mv AT misluzhev theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT vvsemiglazov theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT tyusemiglazova theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT evtkachenko theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT saprotsenko theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT dkhlatipova theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT svkondratev theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT nabrish theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT yuvalekseeva theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT ambelyaev theimportanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT misluzhev importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT vvsemiglazov importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT tyusemiglazova importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT evtkachenko importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT saprotsenko importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT dkhlatipova importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT svkondratev importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT nabrish importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT yuvalekseeva importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne
AT ambelyaev importanceofcirculatingtumordnaintheassessmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatmenteffectivne