Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?

Perhaps the most important issue regarding the language of religion is the issue of the “significance, reference, and the epistemological importance” of the religious propositions; that is to say, are the religious propositions, and in particular, the propositions concerning Allah and his attributes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: hmideh tehrani, saeid mosavi
Format: Article
Language:Persian
Published: Maarej Research Institute of Revelation Sciences 2014-01-01
Series:حکمت اسرا
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_7731_f14879f332092fe7d4709d475875e075.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839626850350923776
author hmideh tehrani
saeid mosavi
author_facet hmideh tehrani
saeid mosavi
author_sort hmideh tehrani
collection DOAJ
description Perhaps the most important issue regarding the language of religion is the issue of the “significance, reference, and the epistemological importance” of the religious propositions; that is to say, are the religious propositions, and in particular, the propositions concerning Allah and his attributes, significant, referring, and indicating of real issues or not, and that is the language of religion edifying or non-edifying? To answer this question, it can be said that a general categorization would reveal that the philosophers of religion have two views in this regard: based on the first view, which is derived from the view of the early Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, religious propositions are nonsense and meaningless. The second view, which considers the language of religion as meaningful, is divided into two sub-groups: the first group considers the language of religion to be edifying and the second considers it non-edifying. One of the most significant theories of the second group is the one that considers the language of religion to be “symbolic” which has been proposed by Paul Tillich. In this paper, following the explanation of this theory and the presentation of the most important critiques leveled against it, a number of verses in the Quran will be interpreted which are considered, by six Quranic exegetes whose views are being discussed in this paper, i.e. Tabarsi, Zamakhshari, Fakhr Razi, Ghashiri, Meybodi and Tabatabaii, to be among the instances in the Quran in which symbolic language has been used. The results indicate that, despite all the critiques leveled at the assumption of the language of religion being symbolic, we have but, at the least, to assume that some of the phrases and terminologies used in the Quran have symbolic meanings, and are not realistic indications of the world.
format Article
id doaj-art-6e1fe57e8b8b4fd59d47e7de0ffbc628
institution Matheson Library
issn 2383-2916
language fas
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Maarej Research Institute of Revelation Sciences
record_format Article
series حکمت اسرا
spelling doaj-art-6e1fe57e8b8b4fd59d47e7de0ffbc6282025-07-16T20:00:48ZfasMaarej Research Institute of Revelation Sciencesحکمت اسرا2383-29162014-01-015437727731Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?hmideh tehrani0saeid mosavi1فارغ‌التحصیل دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.دانشیار دانشگاه مفید قم.Perhaps the most important issue regarding the language of religion is the issue of the “significance, reference, and the epistemological importance” of the religious propositions; that is to say, are the religious propositions, and in particular, the propositions concerning Allah and his attributes, significant, referring, and indicating of real issues or not, and that is the language of religion edifying or non-edifying? To answer this question, it can be said that a general categorization would reveal that the philosophers of religion have two views in this regard: based on the first view, which is derived from the view of the early Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, religious propositions are nonsense and meaningless. The second view, which considers the language of religion as meaningful, is divided into two sub-groups: the first group considers the language of religion to be edifying and the second considers it non-edifying. One of the most significant theories of the second group is the one that considers the language of religion to be “symbolic” which has been proposed by Paul Tillich. In this paper, following the explanation of this theory and the presentation of the most important critiques leveled against it, a number of verses in the Quran will be interpreted which are considered, by six Quranic exegetes whose views are being discussed in this paper, i.e. Tabarsi, Zamakhshari, Fakhr Razi, Ghashiri, Meybodi and Tabatabaii, to be among the instances in the Quran in which symbolic language has been used. The results indicate that, despite all the critiques leveled at the assumption of the language of religion being symbolic, we have but, at the least, to assume that some of the phrases and terminologies used in the Quran have symbolic meanings, and are not realistic indications of the world.https://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_7731_f14879f332092fe7d4709d475875e075.pdfthe quranquranic exegetesthe language of religionsignificanceedifyingtillichsymbolic
spellingShingle hmideh tehrani
saeid mosavi
Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?
حکمت اسرا
the quran
quranic exegetes
the language of religion
significance
edifying
tillich
symbolic
title Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?
title_full Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?
title_fullStr Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?
title_full_unstemmed Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?
title_short Quranic Exegetes and Paul Tillich: Is the Language of Religion Edifying?
title_sort quranic exegetes and paul tillich is the language of religion edifying
topic the quran
quranic exegetes
the language of religion
significance
edifying
tillich
symbolic
url https://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_7731_f14879f332092fe7d4709d475875e075.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hmidehtehrani quranicexegetesandpaultillichisthelanguageofreligionedifying
AT saeidmosavi quranicexegetesandpaultillichisthelanguageofreligionedifying