AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, presents unique challenges and opportunities in an educational setting; however, they lack empirical evidence as teaching and learning tools. This study sought to investigate the impact of teacher-led AI-focused i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keelin Leahy, Ekin Ozer, Eoin P. Cummins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/7/807
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839616135464484864
author Keelin Leahy
Ekin Ozer
Eoin P. Cummins
author_facet Keelin Leahy
Ekin Ozer
Eoin P. Cummins
author_sort Keelin Leahy
collection DOAJ
description The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, presents unique challenges and opportunities in an educational setting; however, they lack empirical evidence as teaching and learning tools. This study sought to investigate the impact of teacher-led AI-focused interventions in higher education institutions in different subject areas. Our aims were to support student engagement, explore the impact of AI tools for learning engagement and efficiency and skill development, and promote awareness of the strengths and limitations of GenAI tools in an educational context. This study was carried out with three distinct cohorts; Physiology, Initial Teacher Education, and Engineering, with year 3 and 4 undergraduate students. Each cohort received two 50 min teacher-led AI-focused interventions, including practical exercises relevant to the specific discipline. Following the interventions, students from all three cohorts received a common (optional) survey that quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated their experiences. Data from the three cohorts was pooled for analysis, with individual cohort analyses for Physiology, Initial Teacher Education, and Engineering provided. Our data indicates that teacher-led introductions to AI tools have positive effects on student engagement with peers, educators, and most notably the subject the students engage in. Students also reported very positive supportive effects with respect to learning engagement, learning efficiency, and critical thinking skills. Students found GenAI tools most useful for gathering knowledge and research purposes, while notable limitations included challenges associated with generating prompts and the accuracy of information. Students noted plagiarism as a significant ethical concern. Taken together, our data collected from diverse teaching and learning contexts support the use of teacher-led AI-focused interventions, specifically ChatGPT, in third-level education. Approaches like this are highly relevant to the university teaching of Physiology, Initial Teacher Education, and Engineering but are also more broadly applicable to third-level education in general to inform opportunities, limitations, and ethical considerations of GenAI in education.
format Article
id doaj-art-6d03eabf09074fba97b2703dff8a7b51
institution Matheson Library
issn 2227-7102
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj-art-6d03eabf09074fba97b2703dff8a7b512025-07-25T13:20:36ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022025-06-0115780710.3390/educsci15070807AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence ToolsKeelin Leahy0Ekin Ozer1Eoin P. Cummins2School of Education, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, IrelandUCD School of Civil Engineering, UCD Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, IrelandSchool of Medicine and Conway, Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, IrelandThe emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, presents unique challenges and opportunities in an educational setting; however, they lack empirical evidence as teaching and learning tools. This study sought to investigate the impact of teacher-led AI-focused interventions in higher education institutions in different subject areas. Our aims were to support student engagement, explore the impact of AI tools for learning engagement and efficiency and skill development, and promote awareness of the strengths and limitations of GenAI tools in an educational context. This study was carried out with three distinct cohorts; Physiology, Initial Teacher Education, and Engineering, with year 3 and 4 undergraduate students. Each cohort received two 50 min teacher-led AI-focused interventions, including practical exercises relevant to the specific discipline. Following the interventions, students from all three cohorts received a common (optional) survey that quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated their experiences. Data from the three cohorts was pooled for analysis, with individual cohort analyses for Physiology, Initial Teacher Education, and Engineering provided. Our data indicates that teacher-led introductions to AI tools have positive effects on student engagement with peers, educators, and most notably the subject the students engage in. Students also reported very positive supportive effects with respect to learning engagement, learning efficiency, and critical thinking skills. Students found GenAI tools most useful for gathering knowledge and research purposes, while notable limitations included challenges associated with generating prompts and the accuracy of information. Students noted plagiarism as a significant ethical concern. Taken together, our data collected from diverse teaching and learning contexts support the use of teacher-led AI-focused interventions, specifically ChatGPT, in third-level education. Approaches like this are highly relevant to the university teaching of Physiology, Initial Teacher Education, and Engineering but are also more broadly applicable to third-level education in general to inform opportunities, limitations, and ethical considerations of GenAI in education.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/7/807artificial intelligencehigher educationChatGPTstudent engagementcreativitycritical thinking
spellingShingle Keelin Leahy
Ekin Ozer
Eoin P. Cummins
AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
Education Sciences
artificial intelligence
higher education
ChatGPT
student engagement
creativity
critical thinking
title AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
title_full AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
title_fullStr AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
title_full_unstemmed AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
title_short AI-ENGAGE: A Multicentre Intervention to Support Teaching and Learning Engagement with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
title_sort ai engage a multicentre intervention to support teaching and learning engagement with generative artificial intelligence tools
topic artificial intelligence
higher education
ChatGPT
student engagement
creativity
critical thinking
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/7/807
work_keys_str_mv AT keelinleahy aiengageamulticentreinterventiontosupportteachingandlearningengagementwithgenerativeartificialintelligencetools
AT ekinozer aiengageamulticentreinterventiontosupportteachingandlearningengagementwithgenerativeartificialintelligencetools
AT eoinpcummins aiengageamulticentreinterventiontosupportteachingandlearningengagementwithgenerativeartificialintelligencetools