Cardiac MRI-derived mean right atrial pressure and its prognostic importance

Background Right atrial pressure (RAP) is a key variable that cardiac MRI (CMR) cannot currently measure. We aimed to develop a model to estimate mean RAP (mRAP) using CMR and assess the prognostic value of CMR-derived mRAP in an independent patient cohort.Methods The derivation cohort consisted of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samer Alabed, Pankaj Garg, Rui Li, Andrew J Swift, Ciaran Grafton-Clarke, Nay Aung, Joao L Cavalcante, Hosamadin Assadi, Liang Zhong, Chris Sawh, Ross J Thomson, Gareth Matthews, Zia Mehmood, Bahman Kasmai, Rob J van der Geest, Tom Alexander Howard Newman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-06-01
Series:Open Heart
Online Access:https://openheart.bmj.com/content/12/1/e003216.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Right atrial pressure (RAP) is a key variable that cardiac MRI (CMR) cannot currently measure. We aimed to develop a model to estimate mean RAP (mRAP) using CMR and assess the prognostic value of CMR-derived mRAP in an independent patient cohort.Methods The derivation cohort consisted of patients investigated for heart failure symptoms with right heart catheterisation and CMR. Right atrial and ventricular CMR measurements were correlated with invasive mRAP to inform multivariable linear regression models incorporating patient characteristics. CMR-derived mRAP was tested as a predictor for clinical outcomes (lower-limb oedema, heart failure hospitalisation and all-cause mortality) on an independent cohort of patients receiving CMR. Both cohorts were derived from hospital registries.Results In the derivation cohort (n=672), invasive mRAP was >8 mm Hg in 56% of patients. Right atrial end-systolic volume (RAESV) had the strongest correlation with invasive mRAP (Pearson’s coefficient 0.58, p<0.01). RAESV was as accurate as more complex models for mRAP prediction (p>0.05). CMR-derived mRAP ≥10 mm Hg was better associated with outcomes than mRAP ≥8 mm Hg in the clinical cohort (n=101) with diagnostic power for peripheral oedema (area under the curve (AUC) 0.75, p=0.02) and heart failure hospitalisation (AUC 0.93, p<0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated elevated CMR-derived mRAP (≥10 mm Hg) was associated with reduced survival compared with mRAP <10 mm Hg (χ2=5, p=0.02) over a mean follow-up of 6.8 years.Conclusion mRAP can be estimated by CMR. Raised CMR-derived mRAP is predictive of lower-limb oedema, heart failure hospitalisation and all-cause mortality.
ISSN:2053-3624