Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Tianbo Liu,* Li Ma,* Yan Wang, Bo Wang, Yue Xu, Ying Gao, Ge Yu, Jialiang Gao, Jie Chen Department of Gynecological Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorres...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/robot-assisted-surgery-for-endometrial-cancer-using-kangduo-versus-da--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Tianbo Liu,&ast; Li Ma,&ast; Yan Wang, Bo Wang, Yue Xu, Ying Gao, Ge Yu, Jialiang Gao, Jie Chen Department of Gynecological Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jie Chen, Email cj2365255@126.comBackground: With the advancement of medical technology, robotic-assisted surgery has emerged as a promising approach for the management of endometrial cancer (EC). This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of two robotic systems—Kangduo (KD-RAS) and Da Vinci (DV-RAS)—in the treatment of EC.Methods: This study included patients with stage T1 EC who underwent robotic-assisted surgery using either the Kangduo or Da Vinci system at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. A comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted on their perioperative clinical data, encompassing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters.Results: A total of 211 patients were enrolled in this study, including 125 in the KD-RAS group and 86 in the DV-RAS group. The surgical success rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant differences observed in preoperative baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood loss, transfusion requirements, or Clavien-Dindo grade I/II complications (P > 0.05). However, the KD-RAS group exhibited longer operation time, console time, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay compared to the DV-RAS group (P < 0.05). Notably, both total hospitalization costs and surgical expenses were significantly lower in the KD-RAS group than in the DV-RAS group (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The Kangduo robotic system demonstrates comparable efficacy and equivalent safety profiles to the Da Vinci system, supporting its non-inferiority in clinical performance for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer.Keywords: endometrial cancer, Kangduo robotic system, Da Vinci robotic system, efficacy, safety |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1178-2390 |