Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect Monitoring

Insects are a megadiverse group of organisms, which makes them difficult to survey without large, lethal collections. At the same time, we have increasing concerns about declines in insect biomass and diversity, which could have serious implications for ecosystem functioning. Current methods of inse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laura Russo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/psyc/8881730
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839631163228946432
author Laura Russo
author_facet Laura Russo
author_sort Laura Russo
collection DOAJ
description Insects are a megadiverse group of organisms, which makes them difficult to survey without large, lethal collections. At the same time, we have increasing concerns about declines in insect biomass and diversity, which could have serious implications for ecosystem functioning. Current methods of insect monitoring are high in cost and labor and expertise intensive, often requiring large amounts of physical storage space that must be maintained indefinitely, making them difficult to sustain to the degree and extent that would be required to track population level changes in insect species at local or regional scales. Traditional methods can also be slow, sometimes requiring years to process and identify all the specimens collected. Moreover, there are concerns about the potential role of destructive sampling methods in exacerbating already declining groups of insects. Due to this, nonlethal, sustainable, rapid, and low-cost methods of monitoring and surveying are needed. I combined modern technological methods, including photographic vouchers and community science programs (i.e., iNaturalist), and surveys of insect roadkill to test as a potential nonlethal method of monitoring insect populations. I repeated these surveys on a weekly basis under appropriate weather conditions along a highway bridge for the duration of a year and recorded 4917 specimens with 3061 specimens (62.2%) identified to 152 species, and an additional 1506 (30.6%) to 111 genera. I found this method promising for nonlethal monitoring because photographic vouchers required less time and space to use and maintain, and using the expertise of community scientists lowered initial barriers to participation. This method also had a rapid turnaround time and was straightforward to repeat without adding significant bias. The roadkill surveys avoided additional insect mortality as they involved insects that had already been killed by vehicular traffic.
format Article
id doaj-art-6a8dfdfc5a974e73848aa45da3ecc85c
institution Matheson Library
issn 1687-7438
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
spelling doaj-art-6a8dfdfc5a974e73848aa45da3ecc85c2025-07-12T05:00:02ZengWileyPsyche: A Journal of Entomology1687-74382025-01-01202510.1155/psyc/8881730Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect MonitoringLaura Russo0Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyInsects are a megadiverse group of organisms, which makes them difficult to survey without large, lethal collections. At the same time, we have increasing concerns about declines in insect biomass and diversity, which could have serious implications for ecosystem functioning. Current methods of insect monitoring are high in cost and labor and expertise intensive, often requiring large amounts of physical storage space that must be maintained indefinitely, making them difficult to sustain to the degree and extent that would be required to track population level changes in insect species at local or regional scales. Traditional methods can also be slow, sometimes requiring years to process and identify all the specimens collected. Moreover, there are concerns about the potential role of destructive sampling methods in exacerbating already declining groups of insects. Due to this, nonlethal, sustainable, rapid, and low-cost methods of monitoring and surveying are needed. I combined modern technological methods, including photographic vouchers and community science programs (i.e., iNaturalist), and surveys of insect roadkill to test as a potential nonlethal method of monitoring insect populations. I repeated these surveys on a weekly basis under appropriate weather conditions along a highway bridge for the duration of a year and recorded 4917 specimens with 3061 specimens (62.2%) identified to 152 species, and an additional 1506 (30.6%) to 111 genera. I found this method promising for nonlethal monitoring because photographic vouchers required less time and space to use and maintain, and using the expertise of community scientists lowered initial barriers to participation. This method also had a rapid turnaround time and was straightforward to repeat without adding significant bias. The roadkill surveys avoided additional insect mortality as they involved insects that had already been killed by vehicular traffic.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/psyc/8881730
spellingShingle Laura Russo
Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect Monitoring
Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
title Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect Monitoring
title_full Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect Monitoring
title_fullStr Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect Monitoring
title_short Roadside Surveys as a Method for Nonlethal Insect Monitoring
title_sort roadside surveys as a method for nonlethal insect monitoring
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/psyc/8881730
work_keys_str_mv AT laurarusso roadsidesurveysasamethodfornonlethalinsectmonitoring