Neighboring Patch Density or Patch Size? Which Determines the Importance of Forest Patches in Maintaining Overall Landscape Connectivity in Kanas, Xinjiang, China
The precise identification of priority areas for conservation based on connectivity can significantly enhance protection efficacy and mitigate biodiversity loss in fragmented landscapes. Priority area selection efforts are typically conducted in landscapes with a limited number of patches or simplif...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Biology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/14/7/881 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The precise identification of priority areas for conservation based on connectivity can significantly enhance protection efficacy and mitigate biodiversity loss in fragmented landscapes. Priority area selection efforts are typically conducted in landscapes with a limited number of patches or simplified to focus on large patches, while landscapes with numerous patches are rarely explored. In this paper, we used a forest in Kanas, Xinjiang, China, as a case study to explore priority patches for conservation according to their contribution to maintaining overall landscape connectivity, as well as to assess how structural factors influence patch importance in connectivity, based on graph theory. We found that the rank of patches varied with patch importance indices (which can be used to calculate the contribution of individual patches to maintaining overall landscape). Dispersal distances were selected, as they placed different emphasis on the size and topological location of patches, and different types of links (binary or probabilistic connection) were used. One critical and seven important connected patches were identified as priority patches for conservation after taking multiple connectivity indices and dispersal distances into comprehensive consideration. In addition, neighboring patch density was the dominant factor that influenced patch importance for species with 50 and 100 m dispersal distances, while patch size contributed most for species with 200 m and longer dispersal distances; therefore, we suggested that neighboring patch density and patch size could be used to support efforts to identify priority patches. Overall, our results provide a unique perspective and a more simplified process for the selection of priority protected sites in patch-rich landscapes, allowing us to highlight which action is suitable for optimizing landscape connectivity and biodiversity conservation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2079-7737 |