Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis

Background The potential role of adjunctive intra‐arterial thrombolysis (IAT) in improving outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains unclear. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of IAT after MT compared to MT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods We sea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi, Mushood Ahmed, Hadiah Ashraf, Raheel Ahmed, Faizan Ahmed, Majid Toseef Aized, Gregg C. Fonarow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.125.001784
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839645401255247872
author Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi
Mushood Ahmed
Hadiah Ashraf
Raheel Ahmed
Faizan Ahmed
Majid Toseef Aized
Gregg C. Fonarow
author_facet Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi
Mushood Ahmed
Hadiah Ashraf
Raheel Ahmed
Faizan Ahmed
Majid Toseef Aized
Gregg C. Fonarow
author_sort Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi
collection DOAJ
description Background The potential role of adjunctive intra‐arterial thrombolysis (IAT) in improving outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains unclear. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of IAT after MT compared to MT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2025 with no language restrictions. Additionally, grey literature sources were explored. Randomized controlled trials comparing IAT after MT versus MT alone in acute ischemic stroke were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a random‐effects model in R. Trial sequential analysis was performed for the primary favorable outcomes assuming a 30% relative risk increase, an alpha level of 5%, and 80% power. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–1 at 90 days); secondary outcomes included good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2), symptomatic and any intracranial hemorrhage, and severe adverse events. Results Four randomized controlled trials encompassing 1395 patients (MT and IAT: 701; MT alone: 694) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated significantly improved excellent functional outcome (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.06–1.63]) in patients receiving IAT after MT compared with MT alone. No statistically significant difference was observed for good functional outcome (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.86–1.32]), all‐cause death (OR, 0.92 [95% CI 0.70–1.21]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.74–2.34]), any intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.96–1.76]), and severe adverse events (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.67–1.66]). Trial sequential analysis revealed sufficient evidence to confirm a 30% relative risk increase for excellent functional outcome. The overall quality of evidence was moderate except for good functional outcome, rated as low. Conclusion IAT following MT was associated with increased odds of excellent functional outcomes at 90 days compared with MT alone, with no significant differences observed in intracranial hemorrhage, all‐cause mortality, or severe adverse events.
format Article
id doaj-art-4a5d743a67654c20b01cd3b3b0ccea3b
institution Matheson Library
issn 2694-5746
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
spelling doaj-art-4a5d743a67654c20b01cd3b3b0ccea3b2025-07-01T18:00:31ZengWileyStroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology2694-57462025-07-015410.1161/SVIN.125.001784Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential AnalysisTallal Mushtaq Hashmi0Mushood Ahmed1Hadiah Ashraf2Raheel Ahmed3Faizan Ahmed4Majid Toseef Aized5Gregg C. Fonarow6Department of NeurologyRawalpindi Medical UniversityRawalpindi PakistanDepartment of NeurologyRawalpindi Medical UniversityRawalpindi PakistanDepartment of NeurologyRawalpindi Medical UniversityRawalpindi PakistanDepartment of CardiologyImperial College LondonLondon UKDivision of ResearchDuke University HospitalDurham NCDepartment of Vascular SurgeryNorth Alabama Medical CenterFlorence ALAhmanson‐UCLA Cardiomyopathy CenterDivision of CardiologyUniversity of California Los AngelesLos Angeles CABackground The potential role of adjunctive intra‐arterial thrombolysis (IAT) in improving outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains unclear. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of IAT after MT compared to MT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2025 with no language restrictions. Additionally, grey literature sources were explored. Randomized controlled trials comparing IAT after MT versus MT alone in acute ischemic stroke were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a random‐effects model in R. Trial sequential analysis was performed for the primary favorable outcomes assuming a 30% relative risk increase, an alpha level of 5%, and 80% power. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–1 at 90 days); secondary outcomes included good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2), symptomatic and any intracranial hemorrhage, and severe adverse events. Results Four randomized controlled trials encompassing 1395 patients (MT and IAT: 701; MT alone: 694) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated significantly improved excellent functional outcome (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.06–1.63]) in patients receiving IAT after MT compared with MT alone. No statistically significant difference was observed for good functional outcome (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.86–1.32]), all‐cause death (OR, 0.92 [95% CI 0.70–1.21]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.74–2.34]), any intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.96–1.76]), and severe adverse events (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.67–1.66]). Trial sequential analysis revealed sufficient evidence to confirm a 30% relative risk increase for excellent functional outcome. The overall quality of evidence was moderate except for good functional outcome, rated as low. Conclusion IAT following MT was associated with increased odds of excellent functional outcomes at 90 days compared with MT alone, with no significant differences observed in intracranial hemorrhage, all‐cause mortality, or severe adverse events.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.125.001784intra‐arterial thrombolysisstrokethrombolytic therapythrombectomy
spellingShingle Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi
Mushood Ahmed
Hadiah Ashraf
Raheel Ahmed
Faizan Ahmed
Majid Toseef Aized
Gregg C. Fonarow
Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
intra‐arterial thrombolysis
stroke
thrombolytic therapy
thrombectomy
title Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
title_fullStr Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
title_short Intra‐Arterial Thrombolysis After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
title_sort intra arterial thrombolysis after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke a systematic review and meta analysis with trial sequential analysis
topic intra‐arterial thrombolysis
stroke
thrombolytic therapy
thrombectomy
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.125.001784
work_keys_str_mv AT tallalmushtaqhashmi intraarterialthrombolysisaftermechanicalthrombectomyinpatientswithacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT mushoodahmed intraarterialthrombolysisaftermechanicalthrombectomyinpatientswithacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT hadiahashraf intraarterialthrombolysisaftermechanicalthrombectomyinpatientswithacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT raheelahmed intraarterialthrombolysisaftermechanicalthrombectomyinpatientswithacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT faizanahmed intraarterialthrombolysisaftermechanicalthrombectomyinpatientswithacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT majidtoseefaized intraarterialthrombolysisaftermechanicalthrombectomyinpatientswithacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT greggcfonarow intraarterialthrombolysisaftermechanicalthrombectomyinpatientswithacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis