Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigore
In the context of Italian nursing education, narrative literature reviews have long been a commonly adopted starting point across the country. However, their methodologically flexible nature often makes them a slippery ground for research novices. This editorial critically examines a sample of thir...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Milano University Press
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Dissertation Nursing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/dissertationnursing/article/view/29651 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839606968502714368 |
|---|---|
| author | Mauro Parozzi Paolo Ferrara Anne Destrebecq Stefano Terzoni |
| author_facet | Mauro Parozzi Paolo Ferrara Anne Destrebecq Stefano Terzoni |
| author_sort | Mauro Parozzi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In the context of Italian nursing education, narrative literature reviews have long been a commonly adopted starting point across the country. However, their methodologically flexible nature often makes them a slippery ground for research novices. This editorial critically examines a sample of thirty narrative reviews submitted to Dissertation Nursing between 2022 and 2024, highlighting methodological, stylistic, and content-related limitations. Common practices emerge, such as the confused hybridization with systematic reviews, the inappropriate use of structured tools without proper justification, and a lack of critical reflection. Added to this are unsuitable writing styles and a general excess of description at the expense of scientific meaning-making. The article questions the educational effectiveness of narrative reviews as an initial approach to research and proposes a pedagogical and operational rethinking to enhance the value of this tool, preventing it from becoming a mere academic exercise devoid of genuine scientific impact.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4a285b45dbe3416aa3bb076f63a080fc |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2785-7263 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Milano University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Dissertation Nursing |
| spelling | doaj-art-4a285b45dbe3416aa3bb076f63a080fc2025-08-01T06:42:06ZengMilano University PressDissertation Nursing2785-72632025-07-014210.54103/dn/29651Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigoreMauro Parozzihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4164-2790Paolo Ferrara0Anne Destrebecq1Stefano Terzoni2Corso di Laurea in Infermieristica, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo - Presidio "San Paolo"Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli studi di Milano (in quiescenza)Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli studi di Milano In the context of Italian nursing education, narrative literature reviews have long been a commonly adopted starting point across the country. However, their methodologically flexible nature often makes them a slippery ground for research novices. This editorial critically examines a sample of thirty narrative reviews submitted to Dissertation Nursing between 2022 and 2024, highlighting methodological, stylistic, and content-related limitations. Common practices emerge, such as the confused hybridization with systematic reviews, the inappropriate use of structured tools without proper justification, and a lack of critical reflection. Added to this are unsuitable writing styles and a general excess of description at the expense of scientific meaning-making. The article questions the educational effectiveness of narrative reviews as an initial approach to research and proposes a pedagogical and operational rethinking to enhance the value of this tool, preventing it from becoming a mere academic exercise devoid of genuine scientific impact. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/dissertationnursing/article/view/29651Revisioni NarrativeInfermieristicaStudenti di InfermieristicaDissertazioneTesiDiscussione |
| spellingShingle | Mauro Parozzi Paolo Ferrara Anne Destrebecq Stefano Terzoni Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigore Dissertation Nursing Revisioni Narrative Infermieristica Studenti di Infermieristica Dissertazione Tesi Discussione |
| title | Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigore |
| title_full | Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigore |
| title_fullStr | Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigore |
| title_full_unstemmed | Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigore |
| title_short | Le Revisioni Narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani: tra aspirazione e rigore |
| title_sort | le revisioni narrative nella ricerca degli studenti di infermieristica italiani tra aspirazione e rigore |
| topic | Revisioni Narrative Infermieristica Studenti di Infermieristica Dissertazione Tesi Discussione |
| url | https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/dissertationnursing/article/view/29651 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mauroparozzi lerevisioninarrativenellaricercadeglistudentidiinfermieristicaitalianitraaspirazioneerigore AT paoloferrara lerevisioninarrativenellaricercadeglistudentidiinfermieristicaitalianitraaspirazioneerigore AT annedestrebecq lerevisioninarrativenellaricercadeglistudentidiinfermieristicaitalianitraaspirazioneerigore AT stefanoterzoni lerevisioninarrativenellaricercadeglistudentidiinfermieristicaitalianitraaspirazioneerigore |