Breaking the Mortality Curve: Investment-Driven Acceleration in Life Expectancy and Insurance Innovation
Capital investment in longevity science—research targeting the biological processes of aging through interventions like cellular reprogramming, AI-driven drug discovery, and biological age monitoring—may create significant divergence between traditional actuarial projections and emerging mortality i...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Risks |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/7/122 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Capital investment in longevity science—research targeting the biological processes of aging through interventions like cellular reprogramming, AI-driven drug discovery, and biological age monitoring—may create significant divergence between traditional actuarial projections and emerging mortality improvements. This paper examines how accelerating investment in life extension technologies affects mortality improvement trajectories beyond conventional actuarial assumptions, building on the comprehensive investment landscape analysis documented in “Investors in Longevity” supported by venture capital databases, industry reports, and regulatory filings. We introduce an Investment-Adjusted Mortality Model (IAMM) that incorporates capital allocation trends as leading indicators of mortality improvement acceleration. Under high-investment scenarios (annual funding of USD 15+ billion in longevity technologies), current insurance products may significantly underestimate longevity risk, creating potential solvency challenges. Our statistical analysis demonstrates that investment-driven mortality improvements—actual reductions in death rates resulting from new anti-aging interventions—could exceed traditional projections by 18–31% by 2040. We validate our model by backtesting historical data, showing improved predictive performance (35% reduction in MAPE) compared to traditional Lee–Carter approaches during periods of significant medical technology advancement. Based on these findings, we propose modified insurance structures, including dynamic mortality-linked products and biological age underwriting, quantifying their effectiveness in reducing longevity risk exposure by 42–67%. These results suggest the need for actuarial science to incorporate investment dynamics in response to the changing longevity investment environment detailed in “Investors in Longevity”. The framework presented provides both theoretically grounded and empirically tested tools for incorporating investment dynamics into mortality projections and insurance product design, addressing gaps in current risk management approaches for long-term mortality exposure. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2227-9091 |