Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial Practice
The article addresses the problems of methodical support for establishing the statute of limitations when conducting a forensic document examination, directly affecting the admissibility of an expert’s opinion as evidence in legal proceedings. Establishing the statute of limitations for the executio...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/694 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839580796397027328 |
|---|---|
| author | M. V. Zhizhina V. B. Danilovich |
| author_facet | M. V. Zhizhina V. B. Danilovich |
| author_sort | M. V. Zhizhina |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article addresses the problems of methodical support for establishing the statute of limitations when conducting a forensic document examination, directly affecting the admissibility of an expert’s opinion as evidence in legal proceedings. Establishing the statute of limitations for the execution of documents’ requisites is one of the most demanded tasks when considering all categories of cases – administrative, arbitration, civil, criminal. Analysis of the forensic practice of this type of examination in legal proceedings shows the application of various methods and approaches. Such variety raises questions among both the judicial and legal communities. For example, what existing methods are scientifically substantiated, tested, certified, lead to reliable results, and can be used to solve expert tasks? Which are unsuitable for the use in expert practice, and for what reasons?To confirm the suitability of their author’s developments for forensic examination, individual non-state experts provide various patents and certificates. How legal and permissible is this practice?The article offers a competent analysis of the current situation on the example of the widely used method of “wet copying” |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3e47b0acd8914b39942c202913c096aa |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 1819-2785 2587-7275 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
| spelling | doaj-art-3e47b0acd8914b39942c202913c096aa2025-08-04T10:23:09ZrusMinistry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic ScienceТеория и практика судебной экспертизы1819-27852587-72752022-01-01164495610.30764/1819-2785-2021-4-49-56606Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial PracticeM. V. Zhizhina0V. B. Danilovich1Kutafin Moscow State Law University; The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian FederationThe Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian FederationThe article addresses the problems of methodical support for establishing the statute of limitations when conducting a forensic document examination, directly affecting the admissibility of an expert’s opinion as evidence in legal proceedings. Establishing the statute of limitations for the execution of documents’ requisites is one of the most demanded tasks when considering all categories of cases – administrative, arbitration, civil, criminal. Analysis of the forensic practice of this type of examination in legal proceedings shows the application of various methods and approaches. Such variety raises questions among both the judicial and legal communities. For example, what existing methods are scientifically substantiated, tested, certified, lead to reliable results, and can be used to solve expert tasks? Which are unsuitable for the use in expert practice, and for what reasons?To confirm the suitability of their author’s developments for forensic examination, individual non-state experts provide various patents and certificates. How legal and permissible is this practice?The article offers a competent analysis of the current situation on the example of the widely used method of “wet copying”https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/694forensic examinationforensic document analysismethodologyestablishing of the statute of limitationsdocumentwet copy methodscientific natureadmissibilityexpert and judicial practiceproof |
| spellingShingle | M. V. Zhizhina V. B. Danilovich Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial Practice Теория и практика судебной экспертизы forensic examination forensic document analysis methodology establishing of the statute of limitations document wet copy method scientific nature admissibility expert and judicial practice proof |
| title | Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial Practice |
| title_full | Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial Practice |
| title_fullStr | Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial Practice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial Practice |
| title_short | Methodical Support for Conducting an Expert Research to Establish the Statute of Limitations for the Execution of Documents’ Requisites: Problems of Expert and Judicial Practice |
| title_sort | methodical support for conducting an expert research to establish the statute of limitations for the execution of documents requisites problems of expert and judicial practice |
| topic | forensic examination forensic document analysis methodology establishing of the statute of limitations document wet copy method scientific nature admissibility expert and judicial practice proof |
| url | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/694 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mvzhizhina methodicalsupportforconductinganexpertresearchtoestablishthestatuteoflimitationsfortheexecutionofdocumentsrequisitesproblemsofexpertandjudicialpractice AT vbdanilovich methodicalsupportforconductinganexpertresearchtoestablishthestatuteoflimitationsfortheexecutionofdocumentsrequisitesproblemsofexpertandjudicialpractice |