DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES

Medieval Europe before the Reformation and Moscow Russia before the Troubles are viewed in an ideally-typical manner as carriers of basic social and mental unities: faith and church organization, sacred empire as the Rome’s usccessor, basic social relations. As a result of the Reformation and the re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. S. Rozov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jurist, Publishing Group 2019-12-01
Series:Сравнительная политика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1071
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839573614818492416
author N. S. Rozov
author_facet N. S. Rozov
author_sort N. S. Rozov
collection DOAJ
description Medieval Europe before the Reformation and Moscow Russia before the Troubles are viewed in an ideally-typical manner as carriers of basic social and mental unities: faith and church organization, sacred empire as the Rome’s usccessor, basic social relations. As a result of the Reformation and the religious wars each of the European unities was destroyed, but parts of the former Pax Christiana continued to closely interact and compete with each other, to fight for leadership, that led to intensive modernization of the leading Western European powers with known global consequences. Moscow State after the Time of Trouble restored its unity in all three aspects. The features of the state and society here were significantly transformed as a result of the Schism, the formation of the Russian empire, administrative reforms of the 18–19 centuries, but the basic properties of etatism, centralism, priority of service, and power instrumentalization of the moral and religious sphere remained. The Russian social-political cycles have the phases: successful mobilization, stagnation, crisis, attempts of liberalization, authoritarian scrollback. The cyclical dynamics is explained by the interrelation of the following factors: 1) the primacy of military-compulsory (“colonial”) administration as a means of retaining and managing vast territories; 2) the state priorities of military power, size of the territory, and the volume of export products; 3) the order of military service as a basic model for political and social institutions; the corresponding weakness of autonomous capital and business activity; 4) the mental, cultural and property gap (lack of vertical solidarity) between the elites and the bulk of the population. 5) the monopoly of state religion (or forced atheism). Thus, unity of political power, religious and ideological monopoly can lead a country to military triumphs and even geopolitical success for decades but in the longue duree this unity generates vulnerability.
format Article
id doaj-art-2e746c1af70d4e45acd128fd6b632eb1
institution Matheson Library
issn 2221-3279
2412-4990
language English
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Jurist, Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Сравнительная политика
spelling doaj-art-2e746c1af70d4e45acd128fd6b632eb12025-08-04T14:03:27ZengJurist, Publishing GroupСравнительная политика2221-32792412-49902019-12-0110412013210.24411/2221-3279-2019-10046629DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCESN. S. Rozov0Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University; Novosibirsk State Technical UniversityMedieval Europe before the Reformation and Moscow Russia before the Troubles are viewed in an ideally-typical manner as carriers of basic social and mental unities: faith and church organization, sacred empire as the Rome’s usccessor, basic social relations. As a result of the Reformation and the religious wars each of the European unities was destroyed, but parts of the former Pax Christiana continued to closely interact and compete with each other, to fight for leadership, that led to intensive modernization of the leading Western European powers with known global consequences. Moscow State after the Time of Trouble restored its unity in all three aspects. The features of the state and society here were significantly transformed as a result of the Schism, the formation of the Russian empire, administrative reforms of the 18–19 centuries, but the basic properties of etatism, centralism, priority of service, and power instrumentalization of the moral and religious sphere remained. The Russian social-political cycles have the phases: successful mobilization, stagnation, crisis, attempts of liberalization, authoritarian scrollback. The cyclical dynamics is explained by the interrelation of the following factors: 1) the primacy of military-compulsory (“colonial”) administration as a means of retaining and managing vast territories; 2) the state priorities of military power, size of the territory, and the volume of export products; 3) the order of military service as a basic model for political and social institutions; the corresponding weakness of autonomous capital and business activity; 4) the mental, cultural and property gap (lack of vertical solidarity) between the elites and the bulk of the population. 5) the monopoly of state religion (or forced atheism). Thus, unity of political power, religious and ideological monopoly can lead a country to military triumphs and even geopolitical success for decades but in the longue duree this unity generates vulnerability.https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1071political comparisonsocial orderempirereformationschismrussian cycleshistory of europehistory of russiaestatespatronagestate service
spellingShingle N. S. Rozov
DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES
Сравнительная политика
political comparison
social order
empire
reformation
schism
russian cycles
history of europe
history of russia
estates
patronage
state service
title DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES
title_full DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES
title_fullStr DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES
title_full_unstemmed DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES
title_short DIVERGING SOCIAL ORDERS OF EUROPE AND RUSSIA AFTER THE MIDDLE AGES, AND LONG-TERM POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES
title_sort diverging social orders of europe and russia after the middle ages and long term political consequences
topic political comparison
social order
empire
reformation
schism
russian cycles
history of europe
history of russia
estates
patronage
state service
url https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1071
work_keys_str_mv AT nsrozov divergingsocialordersofeuropeandrussiaafterthemiddleagesandlongtermpoliticalconsequences