Response to Donald et al., (2025)

Response to Donald et al., (2025)

Donald et al. (2025) misinterpret the central premise of the paper, incorrectly stating that we argue “carbon credit claims […] for increased sequestered carbon from early measurements are based on increases related to favourable climatic variations rather than improved land management”. At no point...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elaine Mitchell, Naoya Takeda, Liam Grace, Peter Grace, Ken Day, Sahar Ahmadi, Warwick Badgery, Annette Cowie, Aaron Simmons, Richard Eckard, Matthew Tom Harrison, William Parton, Brian Wilson, Susan Orgill, Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel, David Pannell, Paige Stanley, Felicity Deane, David Rowlings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Carbon Management
Subjects:
Carbon market
soil carbon
climate change mitigation
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17583004.2025.2484503
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Donald et al. (2025) misinterpret the central premise of the paper, incorrectly stating that we argue “carbon credit claims […] for increased sequestered carbon from early measurements are based on increases related to favourable climatic variations rather than improved land management”. At no point in our paper do we make this claim. Instead, our analysis concluded that “SOC stocks were primarily driven by rainfall,” while also acknowledging the role of improved land management in SOC dynamics.
ISSN:1758-3004
1758-3012

Similar Items