EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation

The article analyzes the EU Carbon Border Adjustment mechanism (CBAM) through the lens of the EU’s aspiration to strengthen its leadership in fighting climate change. The introduction of CBAM is viewed as another step toward achieving the EU's goal of climate neutrality, which has become a stan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. V. Bolgova, E. A. Stolyarova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: MGIMO University Press 2024-03-01
Series:Международная аналитика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/518
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839587626687922176
author I. V. Bolgova
E. A. Stolyarova
author_facet I. V. Bolgova
E. A. Stolyarova
author_sort I. V. Bolgova
collection DOAJ
description The article analyzes the EU Carbon Border Adjustment mechanism (CBAM) through the lens of the EU’s aspiration to strengthen its leadership in fighting climate change. The introduction of CBAM is viewed as another step toward achieving the EU's goal of climate neutrality, which has become a standard for global development. By studying the internal and external dynamics of CBAM's implementation, the article aims to analyze its role as a tool for diplomatic and exemplary leadership. On the one hand, the EU seeks to protect European producers from producers from countries with lower climate standards. On the other hand, the EU’s desire to involve other countries in creating CBAM-style mechanisms is supposed to strengthen the EU’s leadership, contributing to the formation of multilateral “climate clubs” and the gradual revision of the existing climate regime. However, the article suggests that there are inherent contradictions in the EU's approach. While it seeks to protect its economy through CBAM, it also frames these measures within the narrative of multilateral cooperation. This dual approach poses challenges to the EU's leadership potential. The protectionist nature of CBAM makes other global players, primarily the U.S., follow the same path of taking protective measures. China is not willing to give up its own framing of the climate agenda due to its importance for the construction of China’s international identity. Russia’s perception of the climate change problem is infl uenced by its national interests and the structure of economy. The projection of regulatory power beyond the EU’s borders also provokes resistance from developing and least developed countries, which can seriously damage the EU’s role as a normative power.
format Article
id doaj-art-2ce0a5c5fd7948b8a99ceb73e9e4a9a2
institution Matheson Library
issn 2587-8476
2541-9633
language Russian
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Международная аналитика
spelling doaj-art-2ce0a5c5fd7948b8a99ceb73e9e4a9a22025-08-03T13:36:59ZrusMGIMO University PressМеждународная аналитика2587-84762541-96332024-03-01144759010.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-4-75-90430EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon RegulationI. V. Bolgova0E. A. Stolyarova1MGIMO UniversityMGIMO UniversityThe article analyzes the EU Carbon Border Adjustment mechanism (CBAM) through the lens of the EU’s aspiration to strengthen its leadership in fighting climate change. The introduction of CBAM is viewed as another step toward achieving the EU's goal of climate neutrality, which has become a standard for global development. By studying the internal and external dynamics of CBAM's implementation, the article aims to analyze its role as a tool for diplomatic and exemplary leadership. On the one hand, the EU seeks to protect European producers from producers from countries with lower climate standards. On the other hand, the EU’s desire to involve other countries in creating CBAM-style mechanisms is supposed to strengthen the EU’s leadership, contributing to the formation of multilateral “climate clubs” and the gradual revision of the existing climate regime. However, the article suggests that there are inherent contradictions in the EU's approach. While it seeks to protect its economy through CBAM, it also frames these measures within the narrative of multilateral cooperation. This dual approach poses challenges to the EU's leadership potential. The protectionist nature of CBAM makes other global players, primarily the U.S., follow the same path of taking protective measures. China is not willing to give up its own framing of the climate agenda due to its importance for the construction of China’s international identity. Russia’s perception of the climate change problem is infl uenced by its national interests and the structure of economy. The projection of regulatory power beyond the EU’s borders also provokes resistance from developing and least developed countries, which can seriously damage the EU’s role as a normative power.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/518euclimate leadershipclimate clubcbamgreen deal
spellingShingle I. V. Bolgova
E. A. Stolyarova
EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation
Международная аналитика
eu
climate leadership
climate club
cbam
green deal
title EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation
title_full EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation
title_fullStr EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation
title_full_unstemmed EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation
title_short EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation
title_sort eu climate leadership contradictions inherent in carbon regulation
topic eu
climate leadership
climate club
cbam
green deal
url https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/518
work_keys_str_mv AT ivbolgova euclimateleadershipcontradictionsinherentincarbonregulation
AT eastolyarova euclimateleadershipcontradictionsinherentincarbonregulation