Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964

In the history of rivalry between regional and extra-regional players in South Arabia, the relationship between the United Kingdom and Egypt holds a special place. In the 1960s, the Anglo-Egyptian struggle acquired a qualitatively new dimension against the backdrop of the Yemeni civil war, providing...

पूर्ण विवरण

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखक: V. P. Rumyantsev
स्वरूप: लेख
भाषा:अंग्रेज़ी
प्रकाशित: Moscow University Press 2025-08-01
श्रृंखला:Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/285
टैग: टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!
_version_ 1839606354352799744
author V. P. Rumyantsev
author_facet V. P. Rumyantsev
author_sort V. P. Rumyantsev
collection DOAJ
description In the history of rivalry between regional and extra-regional players in South Arabia, the relationship between the United Kingdom and Egypt holds a special place. In the 1960s, the Anglo-Egyptian struggle acquired a qualitatively new dimension against the backdrop of the Yemeni civil war, providing one of the first examples of the socalled proxy wars in the Middle East. The first section of the article considers the origins of the Anglo-Egyptian rivalry in the region and identifies its immediate participants, namely, the Kingdom of Yemen, independent from Great Britain, the British protectorates of the Arabian Peninsula, and the Crown Colony of Aden. The author notes that after G.A. Nasser, a major proponent of the pan-Arabism ideology, came to power in Egypt, it became particularly challenging for Britain to maintain its position in the region. The second section examines the British elites’ conflicting attitudes and approaches to responding to the rise of Arab nationalism in South Arabia after the failure of the Suez operation. On the one hand, the United Kingdom was unprepared to engage in full-scale military operations in the region, which was fraught with the risk of a complete loss of its authority in the Arab world. On the other hand, British politicians were obsessed with suspicions regarding Nasser’s expansionist plans and sought to demonstrate him and the world their readiness to protect their interests. The author shows that between 1956 and 1958 the United Kingdom confined itself to organizing raids by tribes loyal to the British Crown, into the Kingdom of Yemen and delivering surgical strikes in areas controlled by its protectorates. The third section traces the evolution of the British approach to military engagement in South Arabia: from localized ‘retaliatory strikes’ to a sort of hybrid warfare with Egypt in the territory of the Yemeni Republic, proclaimed in 1962. The author notes that Harold Macmillan’s cabinet was pushed toward stronger support for Yemeni royalists not only by rapidly unfolding regional developments and the growing fervor of Arab nationalists but also by mounting criticism of the Conservative Party’s policies from within–namely, the ‘Aden Group’ and the opposition. The article concludes that the shift to proxy warfare tactics was a deliberate step by the British leadership, shaped by both the lessons of the Suez debacle and the inertia of imperial thinking. Although this tactic did not allow the United Kingdom to retain access to Aden or resolve the Yemeni conflict in its favor, the experience of proxy warfare in South Arabia remains relevant even in the 21st century.
format Article
id doaj-art-2bf3f4f388984d1ba2ea46cb9ccd0ee9
institution Matheson Library
issn 2076-7404
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Moscow University Press
record_format Article
series Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
spelling doaj-art-2bf3f4f388984d1ba2ea46cb9ccd0ee92025-08-01T07:58:40ZengMoscow University PressВестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика2076-74042025-08-0117294710.48015/2076-7404-2025-17-2-9-47221Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964V. P. Rumyantsev0National Research Tomsk State UniversityIn the history of rivalry between regional and extra-regional players in South Arabia, the relationship between the United Kingdom and Egypt holds a special place. In the 1960s, the Anglo-Egyptian struggle acquired a qualitatively new dimension against the backdrop of the Yemeni civil war, providing one of the first examples of the socalled proxy wars in the Middle East. The first section of the article considers the origins of the Anglo-Egyptian rivalry in the region and identifies its immediate participants, namely, the Kingdom of Yemen, independent from Great Britain, the British protectorates of the Arabian Peninsula, and the Crown Colony of Aden. The author notes that after G.A. Nasser, a major proponent of the pan-Arabism ideology, came to power in Egypt, it became particularly challenging for Britain to maintain its position in the region. The second section examines the British elites’ conflicting attitudes and approaches to responding to the rise of Arab nationalism in South Arabia after the failure of the Suez operation. On the one hand, the United Kingdom was unprepared to engage in full-scale military operations in the region, which was fraught with the risk of a complete loss of its authority in the Arab world. On the other hand, British politicians were obsessed with suspicions regarding Nasser’s expansionist plans and sought to demonstrate him and the world their readiness to protect their interests. The author shows that between 1956 and 1958 the United Kingdom confined itself to organizing raids by tribes loyal to the British Crown, into the Kingdom of Yemen and delivering surgical strikes in areas controlled by its protectorates. The third section traces the evolution of the British approach to military engagement in South Arabia: from localized ‘retaliatory strikes’ to a sort of hybrid warfare with Egypt in the territory of the Yemeni Republic, proclaimed in 1962. The author notes that Harold Macmillan’s cabinet was pushed toward stronger support for Yemeni royalists not only by rapidly unfolding regional developments and the growing fervor of Arab nationalists but also by mounting criticism of the Conservative Party’s policies from within–namely, the ‘Aden Group’ and the opposition. The article concludes that the shift to proxy warfare tactics was a deliberate step by the British leadership, shaped by both the lessons of the Suez debacle and the inertia of imperial thinking. Although this tactic did not allow the United Kingdom to retain access to Aden or resolve the Yemeni conflict in its favor, the experience of proxy warfare in South Arabia remains relevant even in the 21st century.https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/285proxy wargreat britainbritish empireegyptadensouth arabiayemenarabian peninsuladecolonizationgamal abdel nasserharold macmillan
spellingShingle V. P. Rumyantsev
Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964
Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
proxy war
great britain
british empire
egypt
aden
south arabia
yemen
arabian peninsula
decolonization
gamal abdel nasser
harold macmillan
title Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964
title_full Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964
title_fullStr Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964
title_full_unstemmed Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964
title_short Proxy war: The Anglo-Egyptian confrontation in South Arabia, 1955–1964
title_sort proxy war the anglo egyptian confrontation in south arabia 1955 1964
topic proxy war
great britain
british empire
egypt
aden
south arabia
yemen
arabian peninsula
decolonization
gamal abdel nasser
harold macmillan
url https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/285
work_keys_str_mv AT vprumyantsev proxywartheangloegyptianconfrontationinsoutharabia19551964