Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Background: Managed care systems have expressed interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to determine surgical eligibility for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The relationship between PROMs and patient satisfaction following TKA is an area of active research. We asked (1) what is t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George N. Guild, MD, Anita (Alex) Bradham, BA, Natalie Gresham, BS, Joseph M. Schwab, MD, Alexis Alva, MD, Thomas L. Bradbury, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-08-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125001384
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839651205068881920
author George N. Guild, MD
Anita (Alex) Bradham, BA
Natalie Gresham, BS
Joseph M. Schwab, MD
Alexis Alva, MD
Thomas L. Bradbury, MD
author_facet George N. Guild, MD
Anita (Alex) Bradham, BA
Natalie Gresham, BS
Joseph M. Schwab, MD
Alexis Alva, MD
Thomas L. Bradbury, MD
author_sort George N. Guild, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Managed care systems have expressed interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to determine surgical eligibility for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The relationship between PROMs and patient satisfaction following TKA is an area of active research. We asked (1) what is the relationship between patient satisfaction and achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcomes Survey for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) at 1 year post-TKA, (2) what is the optimal change in KOOS, JR from preoperative to 1-year post-TKA that predicts patient satisfaction, and (3) are there additional preoperative factors that influence patient satisfaction following TKA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent primary TKA at a single ambulatory surgery center. Patients completed KOOS, JR and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale. Logistic regression, best-fit modeling, and classification and regression tree analyses were performed to determine predictors of satisfaction. Results: Among 600 patients, 93.7% were satisfied. MCID was met in 71.8% of satisfied patients vs 44.7% of unsatisfied patients (P < .001). Preoperative to 1-year change in KOOS, JR (odds ratio 1.09, P < .001) and preoperative VR-12 mental component scores (odds ratio 1.05, P = .007) predicted satisfaction. No change threshold for KOOS, JR predicted satisfaction. Conclusions: While KOOS, JR improvement correlated with satisfaction, achieving MCID was not a reliable predictor. Preoperative factors, including VR-12 mental component scores, may better identify patients likely to be satisfied post-TKA. Further research on larger cohorts is needed to refine PROM-based eligibility criteria.
format Article
id doaj-art-2bc283629a4247f18ff3d6b2e0629d3b
institution Matheson Library
issn 2352-3441
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty Today
spelling doaj-art-2bc283629a4247f18ff3d6b2e0629d3b2025-06-26T09:53:06ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412025-08-0134101751Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?George N. Guild, MD0Anita (Alex) Bradham, BA1Natalie Gresham, BS2Joseph M. Schwab, MD3Alexis Alva, MD4Thomas L. Bradbury, MD5Total Joint Specialists, LLC, Advanced Center for Joint Surgery and Northside Hospital Forsyth, Cumming, GA, USATotal Joint Specialists, LLC, Advanced Center for Joint Surgery and Northside Hospital Forsyth, Cumming, GA, USACorresponding author. 2000 Howard Farm Drive, Cumming, GA 30041, USA. Tel.: +1 678 736 0416.; Total Joint Specialists, LLC, Advanced Center for Joint Surgery and Northside Hospital Forsyth, Cumming, GA, USATotal Joint Specialists, LLC, Advanced Center for Joint Surgery and Northside Hospital Forsyth, Cumming, GA, USATotal Joint Specialists, LLC, Advanced Center for Joint Surgery and Northside Hospital Forsyth, Cumming, GA, USATotal Joint Specialists, LLC, Advanced Center for Joint Surgery and Northside Hospital Forsyth, Cumming, GA, USABackground: Managed care systems have expressed interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to determine surgical eligibility for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The relationship between PROMs and patient satisfaction following TKA is an area of active research. We asked (1) what is the relationship between patient satisfaction and achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcomes Survey for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) at 1 year post-TKA, (2) what is the optimal change in KOOS, JR from preoperative to 1-year post-TKA that predicts patient satisfaction, and (3) are there additional preoperative factors that influence patient satisfaction following TKA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent primary TKA at a single ambulatory surgery center. Patients completed KOOS, JR and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale. Logistic regression, best-fit modeling, and classification and regression tree analyses were performed to determine predictors of satisfaction. Results: Among 600 patients, 93.7% were satisfied. MCID was met in 71.8% of satisfied patients vs 44.7% of unsatisfied patients (P < .001). Preoperative to 1-year change in KOOS, JR (odds ratio 1.09, P < .001) and preoperative VR-12 mental component scores (odds ratio 1.05, P = .007) predicted satisfaction. No change threshold for KOOS, JR predicted satisfaction. Conclusions: While KOOS, JR improvement correlated with satisfaction, achieving MCID was not a reliable predictor. Preoperative factors, including VR-12 mental component scores, may better identify patients likely to be satisfied post-TKA. Further research on larger cohorts is needed to refine PROM-based eligibility criteria.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125001384KOOS, JRMCIDPatient-reported outcome measuresSatisfactionTotal knee arthroplasty
spellingShingle George N. Guild, MD
Anita (Alex) Bradham, BA
Natalie Gresham, BS
Joseph M. Schwab, MD
Alexis Alva, MD
Thomas L. Bradbury, MD
Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Arthroplasty Today
KOOS, JR
MCID
Patient-reported outcome measures
Satisfaction
Total knee arthroplasty
title Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
title_full Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
title_fullStr Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
title_full_unstemmed Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
title_short Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
title_sort does achieving the minimal clinically important difference in the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement at 1 year postoperative predict satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty
topic KOOS, JR
MCID
Patient-reported outcome measures
Satisfaction
Total knee arthroplasty
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125001384
work_keys_str_mv AT georgenguildmd doesachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinthekneeinjuryandosteoarthritisoutcomescoreforjointreplacementat1yearpostoperativepredictsatisfactionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT anitaalexbradhamba doesachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinthekneeinjuryandosteoarthritisoutcomescoreforjointreplacementat1yearpostoperativepredictsatisfactionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT nataliegreshambs doesachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinthekneeinjuryandosteoarthritisoutcomescoreforjointreplacementat1yearpostoperativepredictsatisfactionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT josephmschwabmd doesachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinthekneeinjuryandosteoarthritisoutcomescoreforjointreplacementat1yearpostoperativepredictsatisfactionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT alexisalvamd doesachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinthekneeinjuryandosteoarthritisoutcomescoreforjointreplacementat1yearpostoperativepredictsatisfactionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT thomaslbradburymd doesachievingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinthekneeinjuryandosteoarthritisoutcomescoreforjointreplacementat1yearpostoperativepredictsatisfactionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty