Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias:
The following is a naïve narrative of my journey into classic grounded theory (CGT) and the consideration of the possible existence of methodological perspective bias when reviewing literature. Whilst research bias has been viewed from a number of differing perspectives, such as sample bias, intervi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociology Press
2011-04-01
|
Series: | Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/84 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1839656085651193856 |
---|---|
author | Richard Deady |
author_facet | Richard Deady |
author_sort | Richard Deady |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The following is a naïve narrative of my journey into classic grounded theory (CGT) and the consideration of the possible existence of methodological perspective bias when reviewing literature. Whilst research bias has been viewed from a number of differing perspectives, such as sample bias, interviewer bias, publication bias etc (Sica, 2006), there appears a dearth of discussion within the literature on methodological perspective bias, as well as, a reluctance to publicly acknowledge the existence of such bias. For the purpose of this paper the concept of bias is defined as “a source of systematic error … deriving from a conscious or unconscious tendency on the part of a researcher to produce data, and/or to interpret them, in a way that leans towards erroneous conclusions which are in line with his or her commitments” (Hammersley and Gomm, 1997, p.1).
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2a7c9c94e8834f63af1511b4f6cb422a |
institution | Matheson Library |
issn | 1556-1542 1556-1550 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011-04-01 |
publisher | Sociology Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-2a7c9c94e8834f63af1511b4f6cb422a2025-06-24T23:56:16ZengSociology PressGrounded Theory Review: An International Journal1556-15421556-15502011-04-011001Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: Richard DeadyThe following is a naïve narrative of my journey into classic grounded theory (CGT) and the consideration of the possible existence of methodological perspective bias when reviewing literature. Whilst research bias has been viewed from a number of differing perspectives, such as sample bias, interviewer bias, publication bias etc (Sica, 2006), there appears a dearth of discussion within the literature on methodological perspective bias, as well as, a reluctance to publicly acknowledge the existence of such bias. For the purpose of this paper the concept of bias is defined as “a source of systematic error … deriving from a conscious or unconscious tendency on the part of a researcher to produce data, and/or to interpret them, in a way that leans towards erroneous conclusions which are in line with his or her commitments” (Hammersley and Gomm, 1997, p.1). https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/84classic grounded theorybiasqualitative research |
spellingShingle | Richard Deady Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal classic grounded theory bias qualitative research |
title | Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: |
title_full | Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: |
title_fullStr | Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: |
title_full_unstemmed | Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: |
title_short | Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: |
title_sort | reading with methodological perspective bias |
topic | classic grounded theory bias qualitative research |
url | https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/84 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richarddeady readingwithmethodologicalperspectivebias |