A Russian version of AMSTAR 2: validation and guidance
Relevance. Determining the quality of a systematic review is known to be of the main criteria to consider when making a clinical decision. And various assessment tools allow you to determine this, both for the readers themselves and for those who write a systematic review. Aim. In this study we inve...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | D. V. Kvashnina, R. V. Polibin, N. V. Saperkin, A. V. Svetlichnaja, N. V. Torchinskij |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Numikom LLC
2022-07-01
|
Series: | Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.epidemvac.ru/jour/article/view/1562 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Rationale, completeness and quality of evidence for the use of ursodeoxycholic acid in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia
by: Olesya V. Zakharova
Published: (2024-05-01) -
A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of anemia in Africa
by: Abdirasak Sharif Ali Mude, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Efficiency of phage therapy in humans: systematic review
by: N. V. Saperkin, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Platelet rich plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis: an overview of systematic reviews
by: Lin Yi, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Effectiveness of Chatbot interventions for reducing caregiver burden: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Ravi Shankar, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01)