Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
<h4>Background</h4>The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess its role.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies were identified vi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106053 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1839609863552892928 |
---|---|
author | Zhixuan Zhang Ting Wang Jun Zhang Xiaohong Cai Changchuan Pan Yu Long Jing Chen Chengya Zhou Xude Yin |
author_facet | Zhixuan Zhang Ting Wang Jun Zhang Xiaohong Cai Changchuan Pan Yu Long Jing Chen Chengya Zhou Xude Yin |
author_sort | Zhixuan Zhang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Background</h4>The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess its role.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies were identified via an electronic search on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>There were 16 evaluated studies (n = 3337) in the meta-analysis. The combined HR evaluating EGFR mutations on disease free survival was 0.96 (95% CI [0.79-1.16] P = 0.65). The combined HR evaluating EGFR mutations on overall survival was 0.86 (95% CI [0.72-1.04] P = 0.12). The subgroup analysis based on univariate and multivariate analyses in DFS and OS showed no statistically significant difference. There was also no statistically significant difference in DFS and OS of stage I NSCLC patients.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The systematic review with meta-analysis showed that EGFR mutations were not a prognostic factor in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. Well designed prospective study is needed to confirm the result. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1e7edb1bf9614eb8affa5d7d81b5db3f |
institution | Matheson Library |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj-art-1e7edb1bf9614eb8affa5d7d81b5db3f2025-07-30T05:31:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10605310.1371/journal.pone.0106053Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Zhixuan ZhangTing WangJun ZhangXiaohong CaiChangchuan PanYu LongJing ChenChengya ZhouXude Yin<h4>Background</h4>The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess its role.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies were identified via an electronic search on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>There were 16 evaluated studies (n = 3337) in the meta-analysis. The combined HR evaluating EGFR mutations on disease free survival was 0.96 (95% CI [0.79-1.16] P = 0.65). The combined HR evaluating EGFR mutations on overall survival was 0.86 (95% CI [0.72-1.04] P = 0.12). The subgroup analysis based on univariate and multivariate analyses in DFS and OS showed no statistically significant difference. There was also no statistically significant difference in DFS and OS of stage I NSCLC patients.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The systematic review with meta-analysis showed that EGFR mutations were not a prognostic factor in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. Well designed prospective study is needed to confirm the result.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106053 |
spellingShingle | Zhixuan Zhang Ting Wang Jun Zhang Xiaohong Cai Changchuan Pan Yu Long Jing Chen Chengya Zhou Xude Yin Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
title | Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_full | Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_short | Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_sort | prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non small cell lung cancer a systematic review with meta analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhixuanzhang prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT tingwang prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT junzhang prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT xiaohongcai prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT changchuanpan prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT yulong prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT jingchen prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT chengyazhou prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT xudeyin prognosticvalueofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |