Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage

Living mulch intercropping systems are considered as nature-based solutions with a low environmental footprint for managing weeds, improving biodiversity and agroecosystem sustainability. In drylands, however, they may increase intra/inter-specific competition for water, reducing crop productivity....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofia Matsi, Dimitrios Sarris, Vassilis Litskas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/7/1560
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839616705725202432
author Sofia Matsi
Dimitrios Sarris
Vassilis Litskas
author_facet Sofia Matsi
Dimitrios Sarris
Vassilis Litskas
author_sort Sofia Matsi
collection DOAJ
description Living mulch intercropping systems are considered as nature-based solutions with a low environmental footprint for managing weeds, improving biodiversity and agroecosystem sustainability. In drylands, however, they may increase intra/inter-specific competition for water, reducing crop productivity. We tested conservation tillage (TLG) carob plots with and without irrigation (TLG<sub>irr</sub>; TLG<sub>dry</sub>) vs. rainfed intercropping systems of carob and (i) thyme (<i>Thymbra capitata</i>; T-System) or (ii) clover (<i>Trifolium squarrosum</i>; C-System), strategically planted on the south (sun)-exposed soil side (SES) of carobs, to reduce soil temperature/evaporation. Carob water relations, productivity and environmental footprints were examined for three years under semi-arid, low weed-competition (Skarinou-SKR) and arid high weed-competition (Vrysoules-VRY) conditions in Cyprus. Carob yield efficiency (kg/m<sup>3</sup>) in SKR, was >27% higher for the T-System (<i>p</i> < 0.05; SES cover ca. 85%; year-3), matching a higher leaf water content (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to TLG<sub>dry</sub>. The T-System reached 28% and 56% of TLG<sub>irr</sub> yields during very dry and normal rainfall years; TLG<sub>dry</sub> yields approached zero. For VRY, no negative impacts on carob leaf water, at 25% SES cover, were found. SKR’s C-System improved leaf water content (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for only one year. The T-System also outperformed TLG<sub>irr</sub> and TLG<sub>dry</sub> in terms of reducing irrigation needs and energy consumption, breaking new grounds for dryland agroforestry.
format Article
id doaj-art-1e26bf3d3e534d95b4adb7bda2e1fecc
institution Matheson Library
issn 2073-4395
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-1e26bf3d3e534d95b4adb7bda2e1fecc2025-07-25T13:09:47ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952025-06-01157156010.3390/agronomy15071560Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation TillageSofia Matsi0Dimitrios Sarris1Vassilis Litskas2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, CyprusKES Research Centre, Nicosia 1055, CyprusKES College, Nicosia 1055, CyprusLiving mulch intercropping systems are considered as nature-based solutions with a low environmental footprint for managing weeds, improving biodiversity and agroecosystem sustainability. In drylands, however, they may increase intra/inter-specific competition for water, reducing crop productivity. We tested conservation tillage (TLG) carob plots with and without irrigation (TLG<sub>irr</sub>; TLG<sub>dry</sub>) vs. rainfed intercropping systems of carob and (i) thyme (<i>Thymbra capitata</i>; T-System) or (ii) clover (<i>Trifolium squarrosum</i>; C-System), strategically planted on the south (sun)-exposed soil side (SES) of carobs, to reduce soil temperature/evaporation. Carob water relations, productivity and environmental footprints were examined for three years under semi-arid, low weed-competition (Skarinou-SKR) and arid high weed-competition (Vrysoules-VRY) conditions in Cyprus. Carob yield efficiency (kg/m<sup>3</sup>) in SKR, was >27% higher for the T-System (<i>p</i> < 0.05; SES cover ca. 85%; year-3), matching a higher leaf water content (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to TLG<sub>dry</sub>. The T-System reached 28% and 56% of TLG<sub>irr</sub> yields during very dry and normal rainfall years; TLG<sub>dry</sub> yields approached zero. For VRY, no negative impacts on carob leaf water, at 25% SES cover, were found. SKR’s C-System improved leaf water content (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for only one year. The T-System also outperformed TLG<sub>irr</sub> and TLG<sub>dry</sub> in terms of reducing irrigation needs and energy consumption, breaking new grounds for dryland agroforestry.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/7/1560nature-based solutionsintercroppingliving mulchthymeclovercarob
spellingShingle Sofia Matsi
Dimitrios Sarris
Vassilis Litskas
Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage
Agronomy
nature-based solutions
intercropping
living mulch
thyme
clover
carob
title Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage
title_full Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage
title_fullStr Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage
title_full_unstemmed Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage
title_short Carob–Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage
title_sort carob thyme intercropping systems can improve yield efficiency and environmental footprint compared to conservation tillage
topic nature-based solutions
intercropping
living mulch
thyme
clover
carob
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/7/1560
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiamatsi carobthymeintercroppingsystemscanimproveyieldefficiencyandenvironmentalfootprintcomparedtoconservationtillage
AT dimitriossarris carobthymeintercroppingsystemscanimproveyieldefficiencyandenvironmentalfootprintcomparedtoconservationtillage
AT vassilislitskas carobthymeintercroppingsystemscanimproveyieldefficiencyandenvironmentalfootprintcomparedtoconservationtillage