FMEA Risk Assessment Method for Aircraft Power Supply System Based on Probabilistic Language-TOPSIS
The failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method, which estimates the risk levels of systems or components solely based on the multiplication of simple risk rating indices, faces several limitations. These include the risk of inaccurate risk level judgment and the potential for misjudgments due to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Aerospace |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/6/548 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method, which estimates the risk levels of systems or components solely based on the multiplication of simple risk rating indices, faces several limitations. These include the risk of inaccurate risk level judgment and the potential for misjudgments due to human factors, both of which pose significant threats to the safe operation of aircraft. Therefore, a Probabilistic Language based on a cumulative prospect theory (Probabilistic Language, PL) risk assessment strategy was proposed, combining the technique for order preference with similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). The probabilistic language term value and probability value were fused in the method through the cumulative prospect theory, and a new PL measure function was introduced. The comprehensive weights of evaluation strategies were determined by calculating the relevant weights of various indicators through the subjective expert weight and objective entropy weight synthesis. So, a weighted decision matrix was constructed to determine the ranking order close to the ideal scheme. Finally, the risk level of each failure mode was ranked according to its close degree to the ideal situation. Through case validation, the consistency of risk ranking was improved by 23.95% compared to the traditional FMEA method. The rationality of weight allocation was increased by 18.2%. Robustness was also enhanced to some extent. Compared with the traditional FMEA method, the proposed method has better rationality, application, and effectiveness. It can provide technical support for formulating a new generation of airworthiness documents for the risk level assessment of civil aircraft and its subsystem components. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2226-4310 |