A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?

Introduction: Advancements in stent materials and designs are aimed at improving stent-related morbidities, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs), pain, and compromised quality of life (QoL). Various stent materials and coatings have been investigated for their impact on stent-related symptoms. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gaurav Sharma, Naveen Kumar, Diptiranjan Bai, Sachin Patel, Dilip Kumar Mishra, Anurag Yadav, Madhu Sudan Agrawal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-07-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_487_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839639512106401792
author Gaurav Sharma
Naveen Kumar
Diptiranjan Bai
Sachin Patel
Dilip Kumar Mishra
Anurag Yadav
Madhu Sudan Agrawal
author_facet Gaurav Sharma
Naveen Kumar
Diptiranjan Bai
Sachin Patel
Dilip Kumar Mishra
Anurag Yadav
Madhu Sudan Agrawal
author_sort Gaurav Sharma
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Advancements in stent materials and designs are aimed at improving stent-related morbidities, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs), pain, and compromised quality of life (QoL). Various stent materials and coatings have been investigated for their impact on stent-related symptoms. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare urinary symptoms and QoL in patients with polyurethane double J (DJ) stents, with or without hydrophilic polyvinylpyrrolidone coating. Materials and Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing endourological procedures and DJ stent placement were randomized into two groups in 2:1 ratio. In 20 patients, polyurethane stents with hydrophilic coating and in 40 patients, stents without hydrophilic coating were placed. In all patients, a stent of 5F diameter and 26 cm length was used. Urinary symptoms, pain, and QoL were assessed at the time of stent removal, i.e., at 3–4 weeks using the validated ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ). Results: The demographic data were comparable in both groups. Patients with hydrophilic stents reported significantly fewer urinary symptoms (mean score 10.75 vs. 15.28, P < 0.001), lower pain scores (1.50 vs. 3.18, P < 0.001), and better QoL scores (3.0 vs. 5.23, P < 0.001). Symptoms such as frequency, nocturia, urgency, and burning micturition were notably reduced in the hydrophilic group. In addition, 60% of patients in the hydrophilic group reported no pain compared to only 7.5% in the nonhydrophilic group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Hydrophilic-coated DJ stents significantly alleviate LUTS and improve QoL, warranting further large-scale research to validate these findings. These findings align with previous studies suggesting that hydrophilic coatings improve stent-related outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-1b2c60d1921042c8b5445f58e3ee255f
institution Matheson Library
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj-art-1b2c60d1921042c8b5445f58e3ee255f2025-07-04T08:14:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242025-07-0141319019410.4103/iju.iju_487_24A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?Gaurav SharmaNaveen KumarDiptiranjan BaiSachin PatelDilip Kumar MishraAnurag YadavMadhu Sudan AgrawalIntroduction: Advancements in stent materials and designs are aimed at improving stent-related morbidities, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs), pain, and compromised quality of life (QoL). Various stent materials and coatings have been investigated for their impact on stent-related symptoms. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare urinary symptoms and QoL in patients with polyurethane double J (DJ) stents, with or without hydrophilic polyvinylpyrrolidone coating. Materials and Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing endourological procedures and DJ stent placement were randomized into two groups in 2:1 ratio. In 20 patients, polyurethane stents with hydrophilic coating and in 40 patients, stents without hydrophilic coating were placed. In all patients, a stent of 5F diameter and 26 cm length was used. Urinary symptoms, pain, and QoL were assessed at the time of stent removal, i.e., at 3–4 weeks using the validated ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ). Results: The demographic data were comparable in both groups. Patients with hydrophilic stents reported significantly fewer urinary symptoms (mean score 10.75 vs. 15.28, P < 0.001), lower pain scores (1.50 vs. 3.18, P < 0.001), and better QoL scores (3.0 vs. 5.23, P < 0.001). Symptoms such as frequency, nocturia, urgency, and burning micturition were notably reduced in the hydrophilic group. In addition, 60% of patients in the hydrophilic group reported no pain compared to only 7.5% in the nonhydrophilic group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Hydrophilic-coated DJ stents significantly alleviate LUTS and improve QoL, warranting further large-scale research to validate these findings. These findings align with previous studies suggesting that hydrophilic coatings improve stent-related outcomes.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_487_24
spellingShingle Gaurav Sharma
Naveen Kumar
Diptiranjan Bai
Sachin Patel
Dilip Kumar Mishra
Anurag Yadav
Madhu Sudan Agrawal
A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?
Indian Journal of Urology
title A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double J stents: Does it impact stent-related symptoms?
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated polyurethane double j stents does it impact stent related symptoms
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_487_24
work_keys_str_mv AT gauravsharma arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT naveenkumar arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT diptiranjanbai arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT sachinpatel arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT dilipkumarmishra arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT anuragyadav arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT madhusudanagrawal arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT gauravsharma randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT naveenkumar randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT diptiranjanbai randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT sachinpatel randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT dilipkumarmishra randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT anuragyadav randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms
AT madhusudanagrawal randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinghydrophiliccoatedtouncoatedpolyurethanedoublejstentsdoesitimpactstentrelatedsymptoms