Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USA

Abstract A robustly calibrated and validated hydrodynamic model depicts flow patterns over a topographically complex floodplain with a heterogeneous main channel levee. Simulations highlight floodplain inundation dynamics for two conditions, the passage of sub‐bankfull and overbank flood waves. Sub‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shailesh van derSteeg, Raymond Torres, Enrica Viparelli, Haiqing Xu, Edwin Elias, Jessica C. Sullivan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Water Resources Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032982
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839651103341281280
author Shailesh van derSteeg
Raymond Torres
Enrica Viparelli
Haiqing Xu
Edwin Elias
Jessica C. Sullivan
author_facet Shailesh van derSteeg
Raymond Torres
Enrica Viparelli
Haiqing Xu
Edwin Elias
Jessica C. Sullivan
author_sort Shailesh van derSteeg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A robustly calibrated and validated hydrodynamic model depicts flow patterns over a topographically complex floodplain with a heterogeneous main channel levee. Simulations highlight floodplain inundation dynamics for two conditions, the passage of sub‐bankfull and overbank flood waves. Sub‐bankfull inundation commences with the passage of the flood wave crest beyond the lower elevation levee breaches, and floodplain wetting is guided by the channel network. Hence, the upstream sub‐bankfull inundation area expands while much of the downstream floodplain remains dry. The onset of overbank flow is spatially variable but becomes continuous, and the through‐bank channels persist as preferential pathways that produce higher velocity flows several kilometers inland. Meanwhile, near‐stagnant zones develop between through‐bank channel mouths, where water is temporarily stored and routed to the channel network. Also, 48% of the inundation water is from the river while 52% enters the study area from the upstream floodplain. Overall, floodplain wetting and draining processes significantly influence flow direction, and characteristics of the flood wave over the floodplain surface such that a single stage in the main channel does not uniquely define floodplain flow hydraulics. Given these findings we propose that assessments of floodplain hydraulic connectivity account for the effects of heterogeneous levee structure and intra‐floodplain exchanges, as well as the typical flow thresholds associated with submergence and emergence of topography.
format Article
id doaj-art-11f20ad5f6064ae6b8c07dfa87e83d90
institution Matheson Library
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Water Resources Research
spelling doaj-art-11f20ad5f6064ae6b8c07dfa87e83d902025-06-26T10:43:15ZengWileyWater Resources Research0043-13971944-79732023-01-01591n/an/a10.1029/2022WR032982Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USAShailesh van derSteeg0Raymond Torres1Enrica Viparelli2Haiqing Xu3Edwin Elias4Jessica C. Sullivan5School of Earth, Ocean and Environment (SEOE) University of South Carolina Columbia SC USASchool of Earth, Ocean and Environment (SEOE) University of South Carolina Columbia SC USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of South Carolina Columbia SC USASchool of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson AZ USADeltares Delft The NetherlandsDepartment of Biology & Geology University of South Carolina Aiken Aiken SC USAAbstract A robustly calibrated and validated hydrodynamic model depicts flow patterns over a topographically complex floodplain with a heterogeneous main channel levee. Simulations highlight floodplain inundation dynamics for two conditions, the passage of sub‐bankfull and overbank flood waves. Sub‐bankfull inundation commences with the passage of the flood wave crest beyond the lower elevation levee breaches, and floodplain wetting is guided by the channel network. Hence, the upstream sub‐bankfull inundation area expands while much of the downstream floodplain remains dry. The onset of overbank flow is spatially variable but becomes continuous, and the through‐bank channels persist as preferential pathways that produce higher velocity flows several kilometers inland. Meanwhile, near‐stagnant zones develop between through‐bank channel mouths, where water is temporarily stored and routed to the channel network. Also, 48% of the inundation water is from the river while 52% enters the study area from the upstream floodplain. Overall, floodplain wetting and draining processes significantly influence flow direction, and characteristics of the flood wave over the floodplain surface such that a single stage in the main channel does not uniquely define floodplain flow hydraulics. Given these findings we propose that assessments of floodplain hydraulic connectivity account for the effects of heterogeneous levee structure and intra‐floodplain exchanges, as well as the typical flow thresholds associated with submergence and emergence of topography.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032982floodplaincirculationwettingdryinghydraulic connectivityintra floodplain flow
spellingShingle Shailesh van derSteeg
Raymond Torres
Enrica Viparelli
Haiqing Xu
Edwin Elias
Jessica C. Sullivan
Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USA
Water Resources Research
floodplain
circulation
wetting
drying
hydraulic connectivity
intra floodplain flow
title Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USA
title_full Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USA
title_fullStr Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USA
title_full_unstemmed Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USA
title_short Floodplain Surface‐Water Circulation Dynamics: Congaree River, South Carolina, USA
title_sort floodplain surface water circulation dynamics congaree river south carolina usa
topic floodplain
circulation
wetting
drying
hydraulic connectivity
intra floodplain flow
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032982
work_keys_str_mv AT shaileshvandersteeg floodplainsurfacewatercirculationdynamicscongareeriversouthcarolinausa
AT raymondtorres floodplainsurfacewatercirculationdynamicscongareeriversouthcarolinausa
AT enricaviparelli floodplainsurfacewatercirculationdynamicscongareeriversouthcarolinausa
AT haiqingxu floodplainsurfacewatercirculationdynamicscongareeriversouthcarolinausa
AT edwinelias floodplainsurfacewatercirculationdynamicscongareeriversouthcarolinausa
AT jessicacsullivan floodplainsurfacewatercirculationdynamicscongareeriversouthcarolinausa