Navigating the complexities of AI and digital governance: the 5W1H framework

As AI and digital technologies advance rapidly, governance frameworks struggle to keep pace with emerging applications and risks. This paper introduces a ''5W1H'' framework to systematically analyze AI governance proposals through six key questions: What should be regulated (data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Matthew Liao, Iskandar Haykel, Katherine Cheung, Taylor Matalon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-09-01
Series:Journal of Responsible Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665962500023X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As AI and digital technologies advance rapidly, governance frameworks struggle to keep pace with emerging applications and risks. This paper introduces a ''5W1H'' framework to systematically analyze AI governance proposals through six key questions: What should be regulated (data, algorithms, sectors, or risk levels), Why regulate (ethics, legal compliance, market failures, or national interests), Who should regulate (industry, government, or public stakeholders), When regulation should occur (upstream, downstream, or lifecycle approaches), Where it should take place (local, national, or international levels), and How it should be enacted (hard versus soft regulation). The framework is applied to compare the European Union's AI Act with the current U.S. regulatory landscape, revealing the EU's comprehensive, risk-based approach versus America's fragmented, sector-specific strategy. By providing a structured analytical tool, the 5W1H framework helps policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders navigate complex AI governance decisions and identify areas for improvement in existing regulatory approaches.
ISSN:2666-6596